Well well well if it isn’t the obvious consequences of our collective actions.
The article doesn’t have anything to back up the claim. It is nothing more than click bait.
Upcycling!
Working as designed. The US government can now just go after groups with those weapons and use the justification of “look, they’re armed and dangerous!!!” to do it. And the cycle of invading and destroying countries for profit continues.
What is blowback, Alec.
When you occupy a country for years and then pull out abruptly, yes, you tend to leave some stuff behind.
Interesting article, though I don’t like the propagandistic language, such as the term "terrorist organization’. Not a single t of those organizations can hold a candle to the USA military in terms of violence against civilians.
I have a vague memory of America just ditching a bunch of shit there… Is that real anyone know?
(Did not read the article)
My understanding was that it was material left behind for the US trained military’s use. (The guys that just ran)
What could go wrong?!
