

Considering it’s priced at like 110x it’s earnings, I’d say mostly speculation on potential/future advertising revenue?
Considering it’s priced at like 110x it’s earnings, I’d say mostly speculation on potential/future advertising revenue?
Up 330% from their IPO, so this is likely just a correction if anything meaningful at all.
Memes and reactionary comments aside, can anyone explain how the shutdown came to be given that all levels of government are currently controlled by a single party? I can’t find a reliable explainer
I can already see the (state) sponsored Tik Toks.
My brother in christ. They are pulling people from the streets. They are re-writing what schools have to teach. They are removing references to an inconvenient history (slavery). They are calling for civil uprising. They are denominating opposing political groups as terrorists.
If people haven’t snapped out of it now, they definitely won’t when only state sponsored news is on the air.
since Trump is a Russian stooge who was put in office by Putin to deliver the victory
I am unsure. Logic tells me Trump has had enough opportunities to completely shit on Ukraine and has not taken them. His position is IMHO unclear.
strong demand for oil and gas benefits Russia proportionately far more than it does the US…
I disagree. Income for gas exports has not risen LINK whereas US exports continue to do so LINK
And “competitor” in what, exactly?
Geopolitical influence overall (e.g. in the Middle East, Asia, Central Europe)
“Left the US” could also have been written as “Returned to his country of birth”, but that doesn’t play to the fake arms race vibes.
I have said it before and I will say it again.
It is not in the interest of the US that this war finishes. A stalemate guarantees continued weapons sales much longer that peace.
Currently the US is getting
I watched that part of the hearing live. It is clear Kennedy is losing internal support. I guess as long as he is useful he will stay where he is and then be sacrificed to pretend progress is being made
Maybe post this to !jerboa@lemmy.ml
Your points are valid, the discount price is questionable. This is not my area of expertise, I only wanted to question if the headline was reactionary or if I missed something.
Is the 10% new shares issued specifically for the government? I understood they were existing shares so dilution would not apply here.
Really, cos the graph looks like they bounced back to near 12 month highs?
Here’s my low-stakes conspiracy take: If Intel felt it would be profitable to fight back against this, they would have. He forms an optimal scapegoat for their ongoing issues and this allows for the company to restructure without much impedance.
Firing their CEO “normally” may have otherwise meant a further tanking of Intel’s share price, at a time they can I’ll afford it.
I love scam posts. They just make me all warm and fuzzy inside!
And not because of the clearly scammy nature of it all, but mostly because it means that there are sufficient users of Lemmy to make it worthwhile to try and scam 🥰
So, thank you Matrecovery and RaymondBucks079, for letting us all know that the lemmy is infact well and truly alive.
Yeah the requirements are for USB-C power delivery for devices capable of charging @ (if I remember correctly) > 15W.
The requirement was placed in the radio equipment directive of the EU so unlikely they will amend it to add requirements for USB-C cabled data transmission.
Jimijett obvs. What more sauce do you want?!?!?1
While I think your comment is over simplifying the issue, there is strangely little mention that people’s animosity toward Musk are responsible for the downturn. Tesla used to be almost the only premium EV available, now there are significant numbers of competitors.
Additionally, there are too many people with similar views to him in Europe to consider it purely a revolt against him
Ok, so in reality then, the meme doesn’t quite fit. Like I’ll bash a dictator at any chance, but this argument doesn’t hold in a discussion.