Chad McTruth@lemmy.world to Ye Power Trippin' Bastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com · edit-23 days agoseriouslylemmy.worldimagemessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down111file-text
arrow-up1-4arrow-down1imageseriouslylemmy.worldChad McTruth@lemmy.world to Ye Power Trippin' Bastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com · edit-23 days agomessage-square13fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarelemonmelon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoAre we at the point of defending clumsy, hamfisted attempts at satire just because they’re meant to be satire?
minus-squareUnruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·18 hours agoUnless there’s a rule against “bad” satire (which is very subjective), then it probably shouldn’t be treated any differently than “good” satire.
minus-squareChad McTruth@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-22 days agohes not defending the satire shown in the post in the screenshot because obviously that one is bad
Are we at the point of defending clumsy, hamfisted attempts at satire just because they’re meant to be satire?
Unless there’s a rule against “bad” satire (which is very subjective), then it probably shouldn’t be treated any differently than “good” satire.
hes not defending the satire shown in the post in the screenshot because obviously that one is bad