• audaxdreik@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    The problem is that billionaires should not exist but come on.

    Was your first point. I expanded on it by calling out that it is specifically theft and then going further to illustrate that he was using that theft to make personal choices about how that money should be spent, compounding the reasons I find this distasteful.

    Forgiving it simply because it’s philanthropy plays exactly into their narrative. Don’t buy it! Don’t defend billionaires to any extent.

    • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      theft implies violating laws, which few billionaires explicitly do, because other billionaires made the laws and intentionally provide legal methods to extract wealth from the poor.

      • ferrule@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        while i don’t think it should be a moral issue, i think we need to stop trying to make this a fair argument out of some desire to be on some high ground here. what you described is fucked up and we should give them no latitude. it is theft even if they made the laws. the staggering level of difference in energy put forth versus compensation is ridiculous. When someone makes more in an hour than their least paid employee will gross over their entire lifetime…there should be no justification for the billionaire’s existence.