Absolutely needed: to get high efficiency for this beast … as it gets better, we’ll become too dependent.

“all of this growth is for a new technology that’s still finding its footing, and in many applications—education, medical advice, legal analysis—might be the wrong tool for the job,”

      • msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Any significant shift in the model, or a complete restructuralization of the approach.

        As it is, it won’t grow anywhere.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          So you’ve got access to all this stuffs source code and know what has and hasn’t changed with every update?

              • msage@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                48 minutes ago

                Small incremental updates on little tasks mean nothing, the underlying issues are still the same.

                It has no intelligence, and as such carries big risks.

              • msage@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                No, they are spreading lies about shit that doesn’t matter as to not lose the hype.

                If anyone made any significant advance, they would be all over the world.