cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/34329504

Voters approved sick leave mandate by 58%, but lawmakers are caving to lobbying by the state’s chamber of commerce

Being sick is a costly business for Bill Thompson, who worked in the fast-food industry in Independence, Missouri, for more than 30 years, and recently worked at Guitar Center until early July, when he was laid off as.

“As an older worker, I have health issues from working on my feet and with my hands for many years with no breaks for eight to 10 hours a day. I have done it for 38 years now, living paycheck to paycheck,” 54-year-old Thompson said, noting in Missouri, workers are not mandated breaks of any kind during work.

So when Republicans in Missouri repealed a paid sick leave mandate that the state’s voters approved by 58% after an aggressive lobbying campaign by the Missouri chamber of commerce and industry and other business industry groups, he said, “It was a literal gut punch.”

    • Eldritch@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      Missouri like Texas is badly gerrymandered. If our districts were fairly drawn we’d be a solidly purple state. However unfortunately, in this insane asylum. Kansas city and St Louis are locked in with slightly more banjo playing, lead pipe sucking, inbred chuds.

      We can peel off just enough voters for rational non partisan ballot measures. In 2018 we voted to change the redistricting from the 2020 census to be more fair. Which our gerrymandered representation overturned last moment. Now the sick leave. And next year they’re planning to roll back the abortion rights the state voted for after they took them away before.

      Democrats don’t really try to win this state. The indoctrination here doesn’t help them. But not trying most places doesn’t help more. If a 3rd party group made a concerted effort to run local candidates a lot of places would surprise you. Like I said here in the two blue islands we pretty solidly vote for Democrats. But this and select statewide offices are all they run for. I can understand to an extent not wanting to vote for a party at the state level that has no interest in you at the local level. Yes Republicans are fascist snakes, but they show up in all the rural Podunk towns. It’s not a good reason to vote for them. But I can understand why the average ignorant voter would.

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        Couple of things.

        You’re talking about redistricting for US House districts. I was referring to state-level positions. Since this article is about a state-level bill, federal districts are not relevant.

        Old map, drawn by bipartisan government:

        • One strong Dem district
        • One Dem district
        • One toss-up
        • Four Rep districts
        • One strong Rep district

        New map, drawn by Republicans:

        • One strong Dem
        • One Dem
        • One light Rep
        • Four Rep
        • One strong Rep

        The only difference above is the toss-up is gone and the light Rep is in. This is by far the weakest gerrymandering I’ve ever seen, if you could even call it that.

        • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          ‘It’s not really gerrymandering because it only added one Republican district’ is both asinine and blind to history. Maybe if this was the first time Missouri had ever been gerrymandered that would matter.

          But whatever, don’t let me get in the way of the “fuck off and die” attitude so many here have towards anyone living in a red state. Location is now guilt.

          • Nougat@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 days ago

            Since you appear to have conveniently missed the more important part of my previous comment, I will repeat it here.

            You’re talking about redistricting for US House districts. I was referring to state-level positions. Since this article is about a state-level bill, federal districts are not relevant.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      40% voted Harris. Most red states aren’t as red as they appear. Even Mississippi was 38% Harris.