Reddit-ass post with the complete smugness of being confidently incorrect.

One Rich Asshole Called Larry Ellison

The fact that you began this comment with “ITT” makes we wonder if you’re doing a bit or not

Once again, the problem can be traced back to DNS 😜

Fire Merrick Garland and appoint someone with teeth to go after the fucking ringleader?

Is that Danny Ricardo? Lol

Right that’s why was careful to say ”identified” and not “named”. If you give someone enough information to infer with certainty a patient’s identity without express permission from that patient, you’re cooked.

They’re scared of being harassed by Trump

My man, have you heard of Bazzite?

Yeah but at least it ends

You might want to look into letting them reuse yours, that place sounds painful.

I don’t think they do it to make us dumber (there are other methods for that) but to make it accessible to people who don’t already know better.

So, in this case, inadvertent is correct; Although it’s not without side effects.

We DO have a masterpiece. It’s maybe not the masterpiece you wanted, but it is a masterpiece.

We live in an age where the voice can be processed locally on the phone (we’ve had on-device speech-to-text since the late 90s…), and it’s already listening for a wake word, meaning mic is always hot. It doesn’t need to be streamed and use bandwidth; it can fire off 4K of JSON every few hours and relay more than enough information.

Just program whole dictionary of key phrases and scan the wake word buffer like you are already doing. Easy, stealthy, encrypted. Every voice assistant from a major tech company could (and likely IS) doing this.

This also provides ample opportunity for domestic (or even foreign!) spying my state actors, too.

Apple is the one who got caught so far

If you think Google, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Samsung et al aren’t doing this, I’ve got a bridge to sell you.

Not a violation unless he has identified the patient

Maybe I misspoke; I meant “the commenters in this thread” because I was definitely reacting to some comments i saw here

She started strong. In the ACAB era we were gonna vote for the prosecutor, but then she stopped saying “they’re weird”, she stated cozying up to republicans, “I’ll put one on my cabinet”, Liz Cheney, supporting Israel (although honestly I doubt a candidate would survive going against them, maybe once she was president, but it very well could have lost her Michigan)

Point is, it was working and then it got all “brat” and “we need to work with the traitors” and a fuckload of people just sat it out. Probably figured we’d be getting mostly the same either way, since that’s how she made it look. Either Trump wins, or the GOP obstructs for another 4 years while controlling SCOTUS.

The fuck does it matter at that point?

Garland wasn’t scared, he was on his side.

EDIT: this is why Kamala lost the libs when she was like “I’ll put republicans in my cabinet!”

Brother he had less of a chance than Kamala, if anything he should have dropped sooner