That might be, but as an example from Germany, the FDP are referred to as liberal, even though they are against pretty much everything that American liberals stand for.

Their main focus is creating a free market and propagation of unfettered capitalism.

From the Wikipedia page, it’s reads as the middle ground between socialist and market liberal ideas.

From what I know, liberal in other parts of the world often means market liberal, not social liberal

I feel like Shadow over Loathing might tap into the rest, lol

When you press share on the Desktop Web version it also should include a checkbox called “start video at” or something alike.

If you click it, it should automatically choose the current time, too. If not, it should be the mm:ss format so you can enter it there

I still really like Valar Morghulis and Valar Dohaeris. I need to finish the fifth book at some point x.x and the series xD

It was a stupid decision. Sunsetting absolutely trashed my enjoyment in hunting rolls when it was starting to develop.

I am also not really a fan of the main seasonal weapons not being craftable rn. Craftable weapons were what made me actually care about them, because I could feasibly get good rolls

What kinda feels worse is that they unsunsetted things even when they were vehemently against doing that x.x

Partner and I played Mario Kart 8, was quite fun!

In the new release, yes. Though by that metric, no game is a success as Manor Lord is platinum. Interestingly, Enshrouded is not in the top sellers, even though it is older by quite a few months.

Comparing it only to its peers in the category to measure success is a pitfall. Manor Lord is in the highest, platinum, tier, and that is an RTS, colony sim made by a single dev. Does that make all other games in the platinum tier no success?

On Steam, it is in the Bronze category. Considering it only released in october and people seem to have quite some issues with the game, I still consider that quite successful

It also feels kinda on point of what CEOs are sometimes supposed to be. I am not sure where I got this image from, but how I often viewed CEOs for companies where the CEO is not also the founder, is that those CEOs are the figureheads for what the company is doing, take on the responsibility of all the good and bad that is happening.

Like, usually those CEOs are shackled by the boards decision, so they are the face and “risking their neck and reputation”. At least I heard that explanation used to explain why CEOs get so much money.

4.8/12. Multiplied both numbery by 1.2

That is and was the entire point of the nuclear armsrace back then, sometimes called the MAD (mutually assured destruction) doctrine.

Basically, you stock up enough to guarantee you can destroy the world and now no one can use it, without being, well, MAD.

But Putin might be mad enough to ignore that

If you’ve never played a CoD at all, I would recommend just playing the campaign (might be buggy atm though). It usually teaches all the necessary skills in order to be at least of some use in PvP, even when you aren’t a pro in shooters.

Other than that, the Zombies mode is nice.

I came to interpret it as more of a general flag for minorities.

Iirc it started to get more traction during the height of the BLM movement around 2020. It’s supposed to include BIPoC into the pride movement.

Found a piece talking about it

Lindner, and the FDP general, are more libertarian than liberal. This is expressed pretty nicely by ideas like this and his famous “Der Markt regelt das”.

I hardly think it is necessary to be an expert in Near-East conflict or politics in order to condemn what basically amounts to a terrorist attack.

Whether or not they should do something is a different issue all together. But dismissing criticism because they don’t provide an alternate solution to an intricate problem is hardly any more helpful. Israel has many more pathways to do this properly, one idea would be the ICJ.

You’re also falling into an overgeneralization fallacy. While Hezbollah is in the lebanese government, this doesn’t make all citizens of lebanon complicit. Hezbollah doesn’t represent all of Lebanon, neither do Hamas all of Palestine or Netanjahu all of Israel.

Afaik, it is grammatically correct as not is negating make. To me, “let’s not make this weird” implies it isn’t weird and they are trying to keep it that way. While “let’s make this not weird” implies it is weird atm and they are trying to undo that

I feel like that wouldn’t be within his criticism. The way I understood it, it was that he, and I agree, dislikes the i-frame dodging-centric design because it relies heavily on something invisible like the I-Frames.

If there was an animation, a flourish or some other visual marker it would help tremendously.

Iirc EA lost the exclusive game rights after Battlefront 2 (2017).

That’s also why Ubisoft is making an open-world star wars game