Imagine killing civilians and assisting in starving kids to death to the extent that you feel comfortable merely saying “sorry for the inconvenience” when firing on foreign diplomats. I would have thought a solider would say they saw a terrorist flying on a broom behind them before admitting that. These guys were brazen enough to say “sorry you feel that way”. Astounding.

That quote is my answer. Anyway, given the type of user you’ve demonstrated yourself to be this isn’t worth continuing with you.

So you had no idea that post was by yiddish? Doubt.

How old is this post trying to sic people on me?

Read the sentence before the one you quoted.

Edit: you also literally justify following them around because of the abuse you received from them when I asked in my screenshot.

Yes out context it can seem that way, but when you’re following a user around commenting on their stuff when you’re clearly in the middle of an argument with them makes it clear you probably aren’t just dropping by to wish their car well. OP post is 2 hours old. Your comment is an hour old. You just happened across another (8h old) post by OP to comment about their cat? Come on.

I’m referring to you commenting on the cat post but posting “I’m in your walls” isn’t really responding to it.

That doesn’t justify someone breaking ToS and engaging in harassment in return but does provide some background I suppose.

I think it speaks for itself.

It does not.

Edit: For anyone else confuse by this post (you’re not alone) it seems BrainInABox is following this user around and harassing them?

Edit: Now Brain is saying I followed them when I checked out OPs post history and saw them commenting on other post by OP. Yikes. ESH.

To add to your comment, IM, uncensored and file sharing just screams CSAM network to me; either by intention or by who it’ll attract. This place has a TOS and had to wrestle with that shit in the early days on the main comms.

Have your main account set to filter out NSFW to avoid that content. Also, there is absolutely no shortage of that content on reddit lmao. At least when I was there anyway.

Having grown up around similar dipshits, I can definitely understand. It happens.

You two didn’t even have to read the article it’s in the OP about Palestinian Christians. Your reactions are also to criticise Christians instead of “checks out for Israel’s regime”? They’re also Christians in Israel. Assuming everyone in a religion is fundamentalist/extremist would sure make you fit in with the Israeli government ironically enough.

A class with an oddly high amount of women have all been made aware that you’ve pulled out a sketch pad in English class.

The soldiers still aren’t accounted for from my understanding.

Lol at this post after reading an article about this company being on the verge of going out of business.

Finger crossed he gets the book thrown at him for disrespecting all avenues of Korean culture including now their courts. Hopefully a decade or so in a Korean slammer after what he did might make him reconsider his priorities.

Lack of aggression

Must not read much local news mate.

Edit: Like at all

Rat in chief.

I appreciate the more substantial reply.

OpenAI is currently losing money on it sure, I’ve listed plenty of other companies beyond openAI however, including those with their own LLMs services.

GenAI is not solely 100b nor ChatGPT.

but not showing that there’s real services or a real product

I’ve repeatedly shown and linked services and products in this thread.

this a speculative investment vehicle, not science or technology.

You aren’t disproving it’s hypetrain with such small real examples

This alone I think makes it pretty clear your position isn’t based on any rational perspective. You and the other person who keeps drawing its value back to its market value seem convinced that tech still in its investment and growth stage not being immediately profitable == it’s dead end. Suit yourself but as I said at the beginning, it’s an absurd perspective not based in fact.

Oh I see. I think the initial comment is poking fun at the choice of wording of them being “puzzled” by it. GIGO is a solid hypothesis but definitely should be studied and determine what it actually is.

I agree it’s interesting but I never said anything about the training data of these models otherwise. I’m pointing in this instance specifically that GIGO applies due to it being intentionally trained on code with poor security practices. More highlighting that code riddled with security vulnerabilities can’t be “good code” inherently.