Hey bud, FTC, not FCC. Both woulf be bad but this might be worse.

FTC website (current 20250319)

The Commission is headed by five Commissioners, nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate, each serving a seven-year term. No more than three Commissioners can be of the same political party. The President chooses one Commissioner to act as Chair.

FTC website (current 20250319)

The FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection stops unfair, deceptive and fraudulent business practices by collecting reports from consumers and conducting investigations, suing companies and people that break the law, developing rules to maintain a fair marketplace, and educating consumers and businesses about their rights and responsibilities.

They do have a ruling. 1935. May not without cause. Specific language is inefficiency, neglect of duty or malfeasance in office. So your point is…?

If you mean the slider, fair enough.

If you were like me and didn’t know about the double slider; if you drag the comment left, the first symbol is to collapse to parent, if you keep dragging a bit further, it goes to reply. Hope that helps!

Don’t stress, the plastic’s got 'em. Thanks for taking the time to share your explanations though.

I beleive the Ukrainian government said something along the lines of “we’re willing to negotiate as long as there are assurances of support should Russia resume invading” and were told they would get no auch assurance from the US…

So is your positon

a) european countries should put boots on the ground

b) a country should stop their defence with no 3rd party guarantees of protection should promises get broken

c) something else?

Land of the free, patriots of the eagle, when my side does anything, it’s totally leagle

Said Canada to the US…

Wonder if they will ask certain athletes to remove necklaces etc.

https://www.yardbarker.com/tennis/articles/unapologetic_novak_djokovic_proudly_flaunts_his_serbian_orthodox_cross_once_again_after_frances_blasphemous_opening_ceremony_antics/s1_17325_40674459

For sure, good call out, I think they just mean only 21% of people feel sure about wanting kids, and if we remove the age bias it goes to 26%. Honestly it would be more interesting to compare the categories to answers from 10, 20 or 30 years ago to have a better benchmark for how we could interperet this.

Thanks for this, so I redid the math using the two youngest categories (up to 34 years old) and the % goes from 21% to 26% 🤷‍♂️

Thankfully Canada doesn’t have this expectation of free school meals… and everything works fine

My focus is on far more than kids, youre the one saying they dont need any help.

And I’m posting so others dont fall for your BS. Always have been.

Read my response again, try both links.

Where you live doesnt represent the whole country and vice versa

Many schools run their own programs, PTAs do as well.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/national-food-program-schools-explain-1.7160901

Has background on what exists already in addition to forward looking proposals

I agree that food banks are different than programs, again, read response in full

And finally, nice dodge. Should we (society) feed hungry kids yes/no.

Well thats an easily disprovable lie err… lets be generous, error through ignorance.

Canada food programs

There are a number of food programs, including charities that recognize some kids starve over the summer when kids are not in school. E.g. the food banks Canada after the bell program.

foodbankscanada.ca/after-the-bell

So take the time to reflect on 1- your right to feed your kids is not impacted, these programs are for kids who have no food, but you can still provide your own meals

2- without these programs some children starve

3- is there any possible argument that supports the outcome where some kids starve.

Living up to your name cro magnon

Were the forecasts evented for him winning or losing?

Hurr durr

What? Unless I missed something, it gave access to individual accounts not master access?

McKenzie followed up later with a similar statement to the one today, saying “we don’t like or condone bigotry in any form.

Condone:

verb accept and allow (behavior that is considered morally wrong or offensive) to continue

Ah, my mistake in giving you more credit than you deserve. Burden of proof.

While I would like to agree with you, because far too often people dont ask for a source in good faith, would have to be consistent with the etiquette and require that the burden of proof falls on the person that makes a claim.