Yep, and comparing expenditures that differ in orders of magnitude is also complicated. Why is it even worth to cut the lower one when minor changes to the big one have a bigger gain.

The issue is most cuts being deeply political in nature. In my mind these posts only shift the narrative.

You are right, but it put me in the wrong mindset anyway.

Seriously, fuck this. Who even knows what which movie was called and who has even seen all of the new content. It’s just too much. Still very doable, but puts you in the wrong head space. Also a new hope is the first Star wars movie there was, irc.

Today is great! (My bad)

500m is bigger than you think. Also fines escalate.

Sociatal factors suppressing birth rate in Germany may be high rents, inability to find places big enough for a child considering today’s standards, and bad outlook. Also work life balance is skewed for some.

Which is much cheaper than this car. Prices for small cars must go down(and big car prices going way up seems fine, TBf)

I don’t live in car land. Hence I don’t commute or shop groceries via car. Charging seems a hassle for typical trips, but I am not an experienced driver. I want mini cars to be cheaper, not go farther, so using one is more sensible.

I struggle to believe that. Packing more batteries does not mean size has to increase by a lot. the biggest part of car volume is air anyway.

17k for not even 200km range sucks. EVs must get cheaper.

Edit: This does not mean that the car sucks. It means that profits must fall. Can’t have china have a 9k for 350km car. We must be better and cheaper! Also battery costs are plummeting.

Didn’t require balls, mate. Don’t glorify them doing the bare minimum.

No they don’t, because I returned it before a shortage occured. They just lost the profit from rent.

No he doesn’t.

In both cases the additional cost caused by your actions is very low. Damage was still fine to the provider.

If the additional cost per user is very low people should not be priced out, still.

It still may be. Is it theft to take a rentable car without renting it?

You are getting a good without enabling it’s production. Just because the additional cost from you doing this is extremely low does not mean it ain’t theft. Just means it ain’t such a terrible thing to do.

Yes.

Yes. And it is still harmful. But there is no good solution here. He should be able to play a mostly single player game in some isolation from the public. (I.e. put DND on and be “fine” but hated, possibly the game should have made that easier for streamers being flooded by spam.)

That being said the harm being done in America is incredibly impactful and must be stopped at high cost.

Every one is doing that. Lowest stakes+lowest risk make brains go mush.

Just doesn’t hit the same way when you don’t have guns and will use violence.

And that’s a good thing, if and only if you provide pathways to other jobs or phase workers out slowly i.e. by retirement.

“Critical Thinker” Yikes. Somehow the right made that a forbidden word in my mind because they hide behind that as an excuse for asking terrible questions etc.

Anyway. Allegedly the statistics are rather mediocre for self driving cars. But sadly I haven’t seen a good statistic about that, either. The issue here is that automatable tasks are lower risk driving situations so having a good statistic is near impossible. E.g. miles driven are heavily skewed when you are only used on highways as a driver. There are no simple numbers that will tell you anything of worth.

That being said the title should be about the mistake that happened without fundamental statements (i.e. self driving is bad because motorcyclists die).

ShinzoAbe.exe.

Apparently his party/rule did have some sticking points.

Wikipedia: […] the assassination was motivated by Abe’s ties with the Unification Church. This was the first assassination of a former Japanese prime minister since 1936. A polarizing figure in Japanese politics, Abe was praised by his supporters for strengthening Japan’s security and international stature, while opponents criticized him for his nationalistic policies and historical revisionism, which they view as threatening Japanese pacifism and damaging relations with China and South Korea.