By design, they don’t know how they work. It’s interesting to see this experimentally proven, but it was already known. In the same way the predictive text function on your phone keyboard doesn’t know how it works.

The meaning? It seems fairly self evident, a critique of internet arguments, not far from that cliche of ‘touching grass’

What books are they? It’s possible you could find them on one of the sites linked on fmhy.net

That may be true. But that’s also just an appeal to authority. What’s more relevant is that they’re unethical. What if international law said they were ok, would you also think they’re ok?

Are you talking about science or religion? If the former, how could dinosaurs exist without Earth?

They’re making it legal. But law != morality.

I would also recommend the chatbot HuggingChat, it uses open weights models

Are you saying that you should vote blue as a form of harm reduction, or are you being sarcastic?

Btw, either way it’s kind of an American centric perspective. Here in the UK, the red party is the harm reduction party.

And none of those y axes start at zero, which is additionally misleading as it exaggerates the level of change.

I haven’t tried it myself, but isn’t GTK supposed to be good at that?

AfD?

I think most birth doctors know how to help a trans man give birth.

Not to be confused with absolute Unix

I block every instance with ‘porn’ in the name

This would be a great question for Randall Munroe, not sure if he’s answering new questions though.

Your link has a paywall

fhmy.net?

What is rule 1?

Brave posting this on lemmy.ml! But you’re right to make fun of tankies, they make no sense.

Oh, proprietary models :(