- 4 Posts
- 31 Comments
1·2 days agoman oregano => https://man.cx/oregano
oregano - GNOME application for schematic capture of electrical circuits
I doubt it is about that though…?
1·2 days agochoosealicense.com is great for an overview of common licenses.
deleted by creator
Title: “is finally rolling out to the wild”
Content:
Ahead of Legion Go S shipping, we will be shipping a beta of SteamOS which should improve the experience on other handhelds, and users can download and test this themselves.
So, neither that product is rolling out yet, nor the SteamOS beta is rolling out yet?
(This quote is from Valves announcement, but meaning-equivalent to the linked article sentence regarding it.)
5·8 days agoNo game project at the moment. I guess there is one main idea for a simple game I would most likely do.
I’ve participated in a game jam last year with a friend. We plan to do so again this year. February has a game jam for blind players I joined. Maybe it will be that one, maybe I will do something alone, or maybe it will end up with nothing from me.
The page starting with a popover donation call doesn’t help either…
they’re actively alienating users who want to use open-source, because those users cannot get support, report bugs or contribute to the project without using proprietary software
You can still use their source and software though.
Surely, they have their reasons for choosing GitHub over other alternatives.
I know I do, when I choose GitHub over others. (I’m not choosing Discord though.)
We don’t need to trust anybody.
Reviewing every change and discovering every issue is unfeasible on multiple levels. Even skipping that fundamental, base level requirement; you need to trust in trustworthiness from submitters and reviewers, and that people review. You need to trust those maintainers that can push and pull and merge. You need to trust the builders and publishers and distributors.
I doubt you’re reviewing every code change and compiling or verifying reproducible builds on every software and patch version you run. You put trust in the chain. And the chain decided to cut at some point because of risk.
Besides, the idea that employed developers with a Russian day job are a risk… but one fails to consider these were the honest ones who declared their day job.
So you think people do only one job and have only one concern? Do you think people of sanctioned countries, contributing to an unjust war, more or less directly, are a bad place to start reducing risks?
I feel like properly vetting commits to the kernel that does not involve the core contributors and maintainers too much is the way to go.
I’m baffled you can make this point while at the same time not accepting their decision after review, assessment, and consequence. You’re asking them to review while not accepting their decision. From the same people.
Microsoft needs some serious regulation.
Given their OS prevalence, their forceful push to cloud and cloud system user accounts is unacceptable. Optional suggestion would be fine; but they’re doing the opposite.
OS upgrades forgetting other programs and other program file associations while at the same time making it much harder to change them is unacceptable. Offering or suggesting their own products in a non-intrusive manner would be fine; but they’re doing the opposite.
There’s much more to criticize. But those are the worst and obviously unacceptable offenders to me.
Some niches switching to FOSS won’t change their dominance or behavior. Only forceful regulation by state unions will.
The post weblink target doesn’t seem to even play the video but redirect to a different video website.
This video is not available on this instance. Do you want to be redirected on the origin instance:
If it were a successful report they’d want the attribution, recognition, and publicity.
They didn’t see the bad they were doing. I wonder if they see it now. Given their response, I doubt it.
I’m not afraid of no GUI
… was a VMware bill for “10 times the sum it previously paid for software licenses,” per The Register.
… OpenNebula has enabled the company to dedicate more of its 3,000 bare metal server fleet to client loads instead of to VM management, as it had to with VMware. With OpenNebula purportedly requiring less management overhead, Beeks is reporting a 200 percent increase in VM efficiency since it now has more VMs on each server.
Damn. Pay less and gain significant efficiency increases.
Who can apply?
Individuals, projects, groups, communities, or organisations can apply. The application can be for a specific project or an entity representing many projects or FOSS efforts. The applicant or the legal entity must have a bank account and the necessary tax documents (which vary between jurisdictions) to receive funds.
Currently, our focus is on supporting existing, widely used, and impactful projects to specifically contribute to their sustainability. Very new projects or projects with minimal usage are not considered for the time being.
I will instead label them as “Copilot-ers” and “Control-ers”, for brevity.
Were the Copilot-ers copiloted or are they copilots? 🤔 There are probably both kinds.
I didn’t see that one coming
What a domain
Really cool
I see; it’s not button keys, but axis inputs
/edit: Apparently not just axis, but “3D” / free joypad/stick