

It’s a 7. 7 and a half.
It’s a 7. 7 and a half.
Them:" I saw someone once who spoke a different language than me once. What is that if not GLOBALISM?"
Depends on which pope you are talking about. One of them got allied planes in his sights to get shot down.
If the US gets poor enough can a fast food combo cost less than an hour of working an assembly line?
Or if China sells a product at half the cost or less of getting it elsewhere
It’s still deflective. Saying someone else called these events a war crime is distancing their news agency from calling it that even as they spell out details of an event that’s a war crime
This actually works incredibly poorly or very well depending on your opinion if you just applied it to random problems in the US that are like micro issues.
Toilet clogged? Reagan’s fault
“They took all the trees and put 'em in a tree museum And they charged the people a dollar and a half to see them”
Maybe she doesn’t seed?
Alien 3 already has one that came from an ox (or dog depending on which cut of the movie) so at least it doesn’t need to be from people. Honestly aside from that they don’t really get into the interesting DNA combination stuff too much. Could be cool for one that’s like a breed of dog all specialized and whatnot.
Now I’m curious if a Chihuahua alien would be more aggressive than a regular Chihuahua or not
It doesn’t that trans people got half assed representation from a recent movie about a gang king/Queenpin going trans and not being held responsible for all the crime along with the writer saying that they will kinda depict transitioning however they want and not research it in any way.
That’s your takeaway with somebody asking if something is exaggerated or not?
So far all you’ve done is respond to someone who is basically asking about sources and tell them that they are wrong for asking and then respond to me with a false equivalency. What exactly are you contributing here? You haven’t added anything other than saying everyone is wrong not providing any information and then acting combative.
You could have said why they are wrong, but you don’t want to. You want to misrepresent what I said entirely so I don’t know apparently you don’t want to read either
The person you’re replying to didn’t present anything as a fact they asked a question
Everyone is so busy asking what is Oligarchy, nobody bothered to ask how is Oligarchy. Truly sad
Maybe they were referring to the ocean and the poles, like 90% by surface area? Maybe even by volume, as the US is better than living at the Earth’s core?
Idk I think it makes perfect sense. Think of the oligarchs as someone actively firebombing the house in your analogy. It’s not just about getting the leg unstuck but stopping the ones causing the biggest issue
A parts kit always needs a lower. The lower is the part that is considered the gun legally and is registered and serialized normally. 3D printing the lower is what makes it relevant
You’re unaware of the existence of 3d printed Glock lowers? That’s all it was
You don’t seem very knowledgeable about the gun used in this situation.
All articles about what was found on him kept mentioning a metal slide and barrel along with a regular Glock mag, that heavily implies it was just a 3d printed Glock lower so basically just a regular Glock. The only way it would “leave no special markings on the bullet” would be if he used a gun with a plastic barrel, but I believe the FBI said shortly after the og liberator was released that it leaves enough plastic behind to be traceable.
In practice the gun is a regular Glock, that would be easily identified as not being legal in a few states. My guess would be that they weren’t getting rid of it because it’s still a perfectly serviceable firearm and he might have been planning on using it again or at least it probably seemed like a good thing to have when he was in fight or flight mode.
If you really want to get rid of evidence the metal barrel is going to be the most important thing to get rid of as far as being linked to a shooting. Ghost gun is just bad in general unless you are in one of the states that says it’s fine
The one in Panama actually makes sense because it is near the rainforest and acting as a buffer against them. These facilities only work if they are near the flies, you can’t use sterilized flies unless there is a population of flies to use them on.
When you put that together this almost looks like they are signaling plans to abandon support for the Panama facility and allow them to spread through all of South America up into Mexico.