Hi hi

  • 3 Posts
  • 61 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle

  • Make a SWOT analysis for each option. Quantify EVERYTHING you can into personally objective and subjective values. Then A/B all of those values against each other. Then sleep on it, ask other people, and then return to the SWOT tables and try to add and simplify.

    If you still have troubles after that, try to figure out what about either choice you don’t know, and work to find it out with footwork and socializing, asking pointed questions, and paying attention to the things you want in life about people.

    If that still doesn’t tip the scale, it’s probably because you don’t know enough about something else, probably yourself.


  • 100%, music. Get on a music service (not a video service like YouTube) and go listen to genres of music that feel good.

    Music that you liked when you were 13
    When you were 21, music that reminds you of the good times
    Or music that fits how you feel…

    Seriously, don’t underestimate the power of music. It’s literally like magic and has the power to heal, inspire, distract, inform, validate, remind, transport, stimulate, numb, etc… I became a musician because I wanted to help people through hard times and to be better people, because I realized how powerful and important it is.

    Go try old stuff, too, like bob dylan. Or go listen to Linkin Park again like it’s 2003. Or go listen through the entire nutcracker suite by Tchaikovsky (i suggest looking for the decca phase 4 London festival orchestra worth robert sharples that was recorded in the 60s https://youtu.be/S7VrwRJ4t-Y?si=cmLUTdUAmg2jw7kr i think it’s the one, I’m not sure on my phone where it is on spotify). Or if you want to listen to the same song over and over and that feels good to you, then that’s what you should be doing.

    Just keep searching and following the good feelings and don’t give up, like trying new sexual stuff and not trying for a specific outcome but allowing yourself to be in the moment and feel then sensations.

    And feel your feelings. Just find someplace safe, get a good sound source, and let it all rip… if you feel like crying, cry. If you feel like being mad, be mad. You have to actually process your feelings.

    A wise man once said to me, “there’s no bad music, only bad timing”. If it feels off or wrong, just switch it. It takes courage to try something different sometimes, though, so try not sweat it too much either way, and just remember to breathe.



  • It’s ACTUALLY a very obvious power exercise.

    You either get filtered out via said “layoff” or wanting to quit, or you’re desperate enough to work for much, much less.

    In the balance of flow of power, the workers were getting too much, so the people in power plus stock market are “abstracting” that whip crack.

    They will remain in power unless a unified front is achieved. Now that I think about this explicitly, I think the solution is actually unionization. Weirdly.

    Just imagine this exact same thing, but imagine if it were factory workers instead: the workers start being happy and comfortable, then a worldwide event makes some really obvious breakthrough that their lives should be even better, and they start ACTUALLY demanding 50% more money, which means your labor is now 90% of your cost rather than 60% - WHERE’S THAT MONEY GONNA COME FROM?? The CEO’s pocket? Not if they can help it. And, there’s pressure from above that 60% labor was already too much, and to get it to 55% by the end of the year because the stock market and the board demand it. So, you need to put those workers in their place; it’s not about one single thing, but your CEO groupchat says that if you claim this and that, and make the workers unhappy again, unify your CEO friends’ front and lay people off, they’ll be desperate and submissive again.

    It’s literally a buyout from above. The CEOs are like the bigger business, making it shitty for everybody, but knowing they can afford to weather it better than the workers, and that it’ll result in a swing of power.

    And… They’re right.

    What do you even do about this? You either organize militaristically and take on a TON of risks, or submit like the greedy, selfish, rat-scab coward you know you are. And that’s what we’re all gonna do until a leader appears, myself included.

    I don’t like it, but I see it for what it is. Widespread ignorance and misplaced ire are against us. This is the American way.



  • @burnedoutfordfiesta

    [TL;DR: they already are, if you really can’t afford them (and your local government isn’t ran by shadow-fearing cavemen).]

    Legit question, wrapped in incredibly ignorant, destructive, patriotic, inflammatory brainworms.

    That is why you are getting downvoted, fyi.

    Stop confusing innovation with government tyranny. Stop being a tool and using false dichotomies and other logical fallacies that always results in loss of innovation, enrichment of unethical companies, and biological and ecological damage and destruction.

    The role of government is to enforce the will of the people for the good of the people, and finally forcing everybody to adopt superior lighting that is WAY more energy efficient AND way more durable is ABSOLUTELY the right thing to do.

    However, to actually answer your ACTUAL question (why don’t they subsidize LED bulbs?), that is a question of what you consider a need. The idea of subsidizing is one usually of need, and sometimes also to assist in adoption to push ideas people are hesitant on.

    That being said: we aren’t talking about cars, bruh. It’s like a 2-3x increase in price, but will last 10000x longer and use 0.01x the electricity compared to an incandescent bulb. And basically everybody can afford them. And when they can’t, they already have systems in place for that, such as the affordable care act (federally expanded medicaid) and other social net programs like welfare, set up poor people don’t get fucked and have to buy stupid incandescent bulbs for all their lives, living incredibly inefficiently.

    All the time, responsible governments implement shit like this to get people off of dummfuck ancient technology that people refuse to give up. And whether or not this is “government overreach” or simply forcing the hands of curmudgeons is a matter of purpose and perspective, and ignorance is often that perspective, and hollow-facetiousness and cynical plausible deniability in place of the “purpose”.

    “Stop eating lead. That is now illegal.” - the government, when huge corporations refused to do the right thing.

    “Why would I even need that? I’ve never needed that before” - the dumb monkey, looking at the the monkey using fire.


  • If it’s supposed to just produce light, but is wildly inefficient and disposable, banned, since we have vastly superior tech for that, and have for a while.

    If it’s actually got a purpose, like heating things at a specific level, that is not a lightbulb, that is a heater and/or a light.

    Get a million hour low power led light, and a super low power radiant heat coil. You’re already paying a bunch of money and making a bunch of trash, just buy them once now, all y’all hillbilly mechanics.

    I get the usecases, most of them are absolutely valid. But with the need, eventually comes a solution.

    To doricub @doricub: if you believe it’s a widespread issue, you could be the first to design and sell energy efficient and durable, low-cost solutions to this problem. With problems, come opportunities. Help the commonwealth, make some profit. Just be real and don’t inaccurately misjudge the demand and potential and make either really cheap crap or really expensive stuff. Check out copyright law in your region and internationally, and investigate the problem and possible solutions, science is your friend. I hope you make something cool.

    After highschool, one of my best friends had a 4runner that he built up in the marine corps on the east coast. He was a mechanic. When he drove back to the west coast, where we live, that thing was stored in his dad’s backyard for like two years under a blue tarp. He kept a (incandescent) work light on an extension cord in there, and it effectively kept the thing clean and dry. I later helped him rebuild that 22R motor over a week in the snow and learned a ton. That was such a cool experience that I’m really thankful to have.

    My point is, there are needs all over. Yours is, most likely, totally valid. But, technologically, we gotta go forwards, and honestly, you could be a step forwards with that. You’ve said you can only find things not meant for what you want? That’s FANTASTIC. Buy a few incandescent bulbs now, to hold you over, but start researching a solution that fits. I know a lot of this stuff requires some investment, but that’s the ACTUAL point to copyright law. Seriously, I hope you do this and make it work. That would be awesome to see. You can absolutely do it, it really isn’t hard to design something, and find fabrication plants to make parts and send them to you, then sell your COPYRIGHTED goods (for the love of god, look up basic copyright law) at a profit to people that need them. I hope you AT LEAST make back your time and resource investment.

    Also, there are a few main ways to advertise. Because once you get your product made, you’ll have to show THE RIGHT PEOPLE THAT IT EXISTS AND THAT THEY NEED IT AND HOW TO GET IT;) (big, overly-obvious wink).

    Good luck.





  • It’s a neat, young tech that unfortunately still hasn’t been given a fair shot (it’s being used as a bunch of get-rich-quick schemes by most). I was hoping Meta would continue to develop it and gain some integrity karma, even at least as a very small team/project. At least a lot of progress has been made this round of vr hype. Maybe in 20-30 years, another wave will happen and it’ll actually take root. I’d like to see VR actually take hold and be as cool as the sci-fi stuff in my lifetime, or even proof of concept before I die, knowing that it’ll probably happen.







  • One time, we had remotes for televisions. We hated having to point them to get line of sight.

    Did you know that some of the older Gameboys had this? I think it was the Gameboy color. Instead of a link cable, you’d just point two Gameboys at each other, and… Well, they had to be on a level surface like a table. And also you basically couldn’t ever move them or touch them, which was strange for a handheld. …annnnd it basically didn’t work. Ever. So Wi-Fi was pretty good!

    But no, let’s go and use line of sight tech, that seems like a great idea!

    I kid, I kid. I’m sure it works fine enough within its limitations for a certain purpose, I just can’t help but joke about making these connections.