deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

and I was mad when I couldn’t local host StarCraft anymore.

I really try to avoid recreation companies with human right ‘challenges ’ like abusive working environments.

So is Ubisoft worse than most others ? Do they do that junk on console games as well? Like if I got an Ubisoft game for switch would I need a non-Nintendo account?

Based on the words of internet strangers I will not purchase their games. Sounds like way to much to go though just to play a game. Do people really go though all of that to game?

It sounds like way too much effort

Thanks. Is that like how steam or console games need to connect to a server to validate a game before you play, so when the server stops so does your game or is this worse than that? Can’t say that idea appeals to me either.

Anything else ? or was that enough

I’m a very casual gamer. Where can I find out what Ubisoft is doing to get them so much hate?

deleted by creator

That is not true for the Palisades region and Malibu. Most of the homes there would have been newer and they had significant losses.