I didn’t say that. I said voting is not harm reduction.
I didn’t say that. I said voting is not harm reduction.
I could donate a million dollars to the homeless tomorrow if I do well at roulette tonight. if I play roulette, is that harm reduction?
you voted for Kamala and that’s happening anyway.
voting is not harm reduction.
no one was saved from the horrors of the capitalist system by your vote
none of this makes voting harm reduction.
no harm was reduced by voting for kamala
voting is not harm reduction.
harm reduction has a specific meaning…voting is not harm reduction.
I’m right, so I have no reason to change course.
getting snowed isn’t something to brag about
having seen them repeatedly target other users, spin up new instances, and keep on doing it, I have no compunction about calling this shit out
I don’t have any strong opinions on the matter, but I do have strong opinions about Phil’s conduct.
this is nonsense.
I think their goal at this point is to try to push a narrative that I am “toxic as fuck” and did some various outlandish things and need to be banned or defederated
do you think that because it’s explicitly what I’ve been saying?
whether they are all the same person or are all saying the same bizarre things all at the same time for some other coordinated reason.
false dichotomy.
ah. it’s 5oclock somewhere
because I’m not interested in arguing. I’m only interested in pushing out someone who routinely badjackets other users.
Okay, sounds good.
your sarcasm doesn’t make you seem any less toxic
I don’t have a counterargument at all. I’m calling out your toxic behavior.
they weren’t helped by people voting for Kamala either, because voting is not harm reduction.