• 0 Posts
  • 3.71K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 26th, 2023

help-circle


  • Please stop okay it’s dunning-kruger at its finest.

    Any agreement of a ceasefire has to be ratified by NATO if it isn’t ratified by NATO then it doesn’t happen. So Trump and Putin can have their little play acting session but it’s not going to result in anything because no one will ratify it if Ukraine isn’t part of the negotiations. America been big is irrelevant.

    What’s America going to do to enforce their version of the ceasefire, if Ukraine disagrees with it if the rest of NATO disagree with it? NATO will continue to supply Ukraine with weapons, and Ukraine will continue to use those weapons. And Trump will do what?


  • Oh God there are so many problems with your response where do I even start?

    lots of the latest negotiations (with the US) seem to involve Russia gaining territory in any peace agreement.

    That’s just Trump doing Trump things, it’s got no basis in reality. You cannot have a negotiation where one of the parties is not present. Anything agreed with Russia will not be enforced by the international community. This has already been condemned by pretty much everyone else in the western world so I don’t know why you brought it up.

    they’re switching over to a fully wartime economy, so they’re in it for the long haul.

    So? They are at war so obviously they are switching over to a wartime economy. That doesn’t indicate any intention to attack NATO.

    Ukraine, even with all the western weapons, is treading water.

    They are hardly getting given the latest stuff. Meanwhile Russia is Fielding Soviet era tanks. I think will be okay.

    Just to demonstrate what I mean, the estimated military casualties for the Soviet Union in WW2 was around 8.6 million. And then they won.

    Firstly that was 60 years ago and wasn’t under the auspices of Putin. Who is widely regarded as a nut case. Secondly they wouldn’t have won had it not been for the allied forces having already severely hammered the Nazis.

    Throwing meat into the grinder is not a tactic, it’s just desperation.


  • Echo Dot@feddit.uktoTechnology@lemmy.worldAi Code Commits
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    There’s more to it than that, there’s also the cost of implementation.

    If a self-driving car killed on average one less human than your average human does, but costs $100,000 to install in the car, then it still isn’t worth implementing.

    Yes I know that puts a price on human life but that is how economics works.


  • Echo Dot@feddit.uktoTechnology@lemmy.worldAi Code Commits
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    21 hours ago

    You’d have to be an idiot to merge anything from an AI without going through it line by line. Which really is the problem with AI, it’s mostly fine if you keep an eye on it but the fact you have to keep an eye on it kind of renders the whole thing pointless.

    It’s like self-driving cars, if I have to keep an eye on it to make sure it won’t randomly crash into a tree I might as well drive the damn thing myself.


  • Echo Dot@feddit.uktoTechnology@lemmy.worldAi Code Commits
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I guess I have no problem in theory with AI agents taking a look at my code it’s just I would want it opt in only. I don’t want to have to deal with them on legacy projects that I’m not working on, or anything mission critical (if there is a bug in the code but the application overall still works, I’d rather not have an AI dick around with it until I have time to properly go through it).

    To be clear, I would have the same objections to a human doing the same things. It’s just that most humans don’t randomly submit pull requests on otherwise inactive repos.