Why do rich people support Republican politicians, more at 11. /s
Why do rich people support Republican politicians, more at 11. /s
“This weakness they see, [Democrats] not getting things done, not being able to actually fight for people — is something that needs to be figured out,” Russell said. “It might not be the message, it might be the policy. It might be something a little bit deeper that has to be addressed by the party.”
People see Democrat failure. They do not see Republican sabotage.
But the move also comes amid deepening concern about the weakness of the EU’s economy and the ability of companies to meet ambitious climate targets without relying on cheap imports.
Russia can launch one nuke into space and take out USA power grid. No radiation at ground level.
“He’s Trump’s comfort blanket,” the ally told the Guardian. “And he’s like a cockroach. He never dies.”
Good to know, thanks. That might explain some of the articles popping up lately.
Bulwark has been on a good article blitz recently.
The whole point is that there is no challenge. It is sabotage funded by Republicans and Putin.
What challenges has she done when not running for POTUS?
How is this the first time me hearing this wonderful idea?
The decision by Uncommitted not to back Harris may not hamper her chances at winning the White House in November, but it bodes poorly for the progress Democrats had aspired to make in engaging disenchanted voters — not just their Arab and Muslim constituents.
I mean, the Uncommitted org is pretty much a single issue org so there’s not much to work with or talk about. I still think when Kamala wins there will be a course change concerning Israel because Democrats know how important holding the White House for 12 years is. Right now the Presidential election is more important than single issue voters.
One of the things wrong with reddit is you are told to report comments. Mods delete and ban the ones they don’t like. They keep the ones they like.
This works well if you agree with mods and agree with approved trolls…
One of the things that went wrong with reddit, is some mods weaponized that rule itself, using it to provide immunity to rule breakers they agreed with by banning people who reported the rule breaking behavior.
Total War.
The term was coined by a general during the American Civil War and has been defined as “A war that is unrestricted in terms of the weapons used, the territory or combatants involved, or the objectives pursued, especially one in which the laws of war are disregarded.”
“Forcing recorded votes is possible. Frequent quorum calls are possible. A wide variety of dilatory motions are possible. In short, harassing the majority is possible. If they think it’s a bad idea, say so. If they say it’s not possible, they’re lying.”
I like how politicians voting is considered a time out. It’s their job, jfc.