ggppjj

There is! Both games are good, this feels more like a maintenance release to ensure the original remains playable. The remake has IIRC an “original game” mode that stays true to the source, but I was pleasantly surprised with the new and altered puzzles in the remake.

Exile is my comfort game, just so wonderful.

And access is/was gated behind a paywall that comes with like mod powers or some nonsense.

Could be that the machine they have to make springs is designed to make single length springs and they changed it up a bit to accommodate making a double-length version by only changing the cut frequency or something similar

There’s a base default, for games that don’t have a valve default. Devs can also set a default themselves IIRC which is essentially the same as a valve default for the purposes of this conversation. The original implementation did not automatically allow all games without a valve default to be run, something that there’s still a setting for which is now default on. The override option overrides either the valve default if there is one or the base default if both the option to allow games without valve defaults is on and there is no valve default.

So if you override a game that does have a valve default and then remove the override, it’ll use the valve default whatever that happens to be at the time.

I really don’t understand the aggression, I was talking about the old rich dead people propaganda concerning no taxation without representation 200 years ago, I never said anything about the fuckwads we have today.

If you think I’m saying something different, explain what you read and allow me the opportunity to clarify my intent.

Saying I’m full of shit at this point is just asinine.

I don’t know, I don’t see anyone saying that here.

That’s possibly reframing “no taxation without representation” a bit but I don’t entirely disagree with the sentiment.

First three times I got the wheel it triggered.

I didn’t understand the memes.

Then it never happened again.

An ordnance technician at a dead run outranks everybody.

OK, what is the better metric? I’m not trying to gotcha really, but I use tap and pay and my banking apps very incredibly often and would not consider a phone where I couldn’t, and suspect that it is a significant driving factor for others as well.

Define many as a percentage of ~8 billion+ humans with smartphones or thereabouts

That’s called a sneakernet. Although, if you’re talking actual pigeons, you may be interested in RFC1149.

I’m gonna teach you a lesson on improv: “yes, and”.

A crucial part of your statement is that it knows that it’s untrue, which it is incapable of. I would agree with you if it were actually capable of understanding.

https://chatgpt.com/share/67c64160-308c-8011-9bdf-c53379620e40

A false statement would be me saying that the color of a light that I cannot see and have never seen that is currently red is actually green without knowing. I am just as easily probably right as I am probably wrong, statistics are involved.

A lie would be me knowing that the color of a light that I am currently looking at is currently red and saying that it is actually green. No statistics, I’ve done this intentionally and the only outcome of my decision to act was that I spoke a falsehood.

AIs can generate false statements, yes, but they are not capable of lying. Lying requires cognition, which LLMs are, by their own admission and by the admission of the companies developing them, at the very least not currently capable of, and personally I believe that it’s likely that LLMs never will be.

Ask chatgpt, I’m done arguing effective consciousness vs actual consciousness.

https://chatgpt.com/share/67c64160-308c-8011-9bdf-c53379620e40

What do you believe that it is actively doing?

Again, it is very cool and incredibly good math that provides the next word in the chain that most likely matches what came before it. They do not think. Even models that deliberate are essentially just self-reinforcing the internal math with what is basically a second LLM to keep the first on-task, because that appears to help distribute the probabilities better.

I will not answer the brain question until LLMs have brains also.

We did, a long time ago. It’s called an encyclopedia.

If humans can’t be trusted to only provide facts, how can we be trusted to make a machine that only provides facts? How do we deal with disputed truths? Grey areas?