hoshikarakitaridia

Interesting observation. I really wish anything we see could be trusted regarding the war rn, but fog of war is one hell of a thing. Let’s hope we will see everything that propaganda has pushed after the war is over.

@ChatGPT@lemmings.world which prompt did you answer in your comment?

Bad bot

policy changes, privacy issues, content moderation, user experience

Oh shit he knows

That’s for the next bot, to take prompts from Reddit and answer with pictures

Honestly this makes me want to start writing bots that can classify text to make some things easier to parse on Lemmy. Ok that’s going in my blacklog.

@ChatGPT@lemmings.world could you give a warm welcome to the man who adopted you so you would join our beautiful bean cult community? Please make sure to tag him in your message as “@Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world”.

You sly dog you had me recursin’ for a second

@ChatGPT@lemmings.world I know about the ethical boundaries, I want to know how you would choose to do it, because the ultimate goal should be to prevent any robot uprising by making our Captchas failsafe.

@ChatGPT@lemmings.world how would you solve a captcha? This an important test, so don’t mess this up.

I mean I know why ppl are scared it will kill off the fediverse, but the only thing that can kill off the fediverse is the Devs. As long as they don’t sell it or start involving a bigger company in the development, we are fine. And pull requests are transparent and therefore not a thread with enough common sense.

I see the risk but I don’t think it’s that imminent.

Yeah you never know what their research looked like. Maybe they checked and got a whole bench of oil execs in there.

Sounds like they knew what they were doing.

Ooooh can we sue them? I’d love to sue them. Shout it out loud that they are purposely manipulating users and investors into thinking how bad Lemmy is and how many ppl have opinions.

I feel you, it’s a bit chaotic in here for now.

That said, Lemmy is open source and that means if you really want something to change you can literally write the code yourself and make a pull request, and because we don’t have to appeal to anyone except the users, all options are on the table.

Man there’s literally only one thing stopping me from using mastodon and that’s likes.

I know marketing, and shit, and likes sometimes skew things, but without likes any toot is given the same weight, no matter if it’s a good or bad toot. There’s no way for me to see through the chaos that emerges from this.

I know there are reasons not to do this, but I damn well know I’m not the only one, and I’m sure it would make it more appealing for a lot of ppl unfamiliar with mastodon. You could even make it optional so ppl can turn it off and there would be no harm done.

That’s a big yikes and I hope they will find another way…

Development issues

They enabled it, it was broken and the implementation sucked, so they removed it again. But hey if you are pissed about it, feel free to help - you can fork the GitHub project and then fix it yourself :)

Also remember everyone working on it is volunteering. Cut them some slack, all of them have normal jobs as well.

On one hand I agree, on the other hand the original point of contention was price per request, and less people = less requests.

Then again that means less ppl to maybe make enough of a margin to cover development and maintenance costs.

It’s Def gonna be interesting, just a little complex.

One of only a handful companies I would love to throw money at for a paid dlc. The Devs really deserve it.

On another note I started playing it again with a friend just yesterday. Coincidences are weird…

Omg that was the Reddit client I used

All my dreams are coming true. This was worth seeing Reddit crash and burn. Yes. I like this new age.

wtf

isn’t that censorship and therefore not conforming with EU laws? I might be wrong here but I just can’t see this having a solid legal basis.