• 2 Posts
  • 182 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 4th, 2023

help-circle
  • howrar@lemmy.catoComic Strips@lemmy.worldCollege
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    When I was doing my undergrad, there was this sketchy shop in a nearby alley where they photocopy textbooks and sold them for just a bit more than the cost of the paper and binding. If they didn’t have it, you could borrow it from the library to lend them and they’ll give you a free copy in exchange.





  • howrar@lemmy.catoScience@beehaw.orgLet em loose
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    It’s a bit of a circular problem. Certain journals have a reputation of publishing higher quality work, so if you see where it’s published, you’re more likely to read it. Since it draws in readers, it leads to more citations. More citations means more people want to publish there, meaning that the journal gets to be more selective and gets to choose the cream of the crop. Thus maintaining their reputation of publishing higher quality work.



  • if you simply take the average across the available generations (which is what I did)

    Bruh

    1−(.54+.52+.42+.29)/4 = 56%

    This assumes that there’s the exact same number of people in each generation. There are not. If the above is what you did, then what you’ve calculated is the percentage of generations that have over 5k. Squid is talking about the percentage of people who have over 5k. Those are two different numbers.




  • I’ve been picking them up religiously after I found out I missed Frostpunk. The only ones I’ve played were the big names like Control, Death Standing, and the old Fallout games. For everything else, the client doesn’t give you enough information to decide if it’s worth your time or not. I keep having to go back and forth between Epic and Steam to read reviews and the “similar to other games you’ve played” thing. It’s not worth the effort.