Skimmed the article and I’m still confused. Why can’t people just link to the actual data?

To piggyback on this, left-leaning echo chambers tend to underestimate the impact of turning on Israel amongst older voters, who tend to be more religious.

It’s literally the stupidest possible way to write it

Except Yass is like the face of oligarchy and the one reason Trump wants to stop the ban

Can’t blame him on that last one tbh

Grandma? You aren’t the best at guessing ages

I bet we can fundraise to get you there so you can just poop on the floor in the middle of the hearing. You can be the hero

Anti-trans laws have only increased in recent years. Having a Republican president won’t impact state legislatures and their momentum on this

Willing to put money where your mouth is on that timeline?

Conservatives don’t need another reason to roll this back besides money

4% of reported crimes. That’s even worse

To be fair, the judge specified that it was because he won reelection, not because he was a candidate

It happens, no worries. That’s why I usually comment instead of delete with Rule 4

Ha, I actually did misread your comment lol

Considering the article specifies “full-service restaurants,” Imma go with no

Please see rule 4 and update your post title

I hope you aren’t from Ohio

The point is that it addresses a historic inequality. We should care about addressing those

The article from a liberal Black news site is racist against Black people?

Do people read article before commenting? It literally goes into the history of racism that caused this.

I’m not sure I follow. What are their political views?

Edit: you all assumed this was some right wing rag upset about this but it’s literally a self-described Black news site praising it