I wouldn’t be surprised if Trump threatened military action in return, should Canada go forward with it. I mean, it sounds crazy to write it, but is it really too crazy for Trump?

When you’re a government, you need a little more process to ensure things are done well (moderation, security, …). Even something simple like that could take valuable time from quite a few people.

Sad but unfortunately fairly justified. Hard to justify spending public money on 3,500 users.

Well, this should give them some motivation.

Are you really sure? 😂

WHAT? Where is the next one planned to take place?

Not really. People in developed countries need to divide their emissions by approximately ten times. Every little bit helps. And we should start with the easy ones.

They are obvious because they are rarely irreplaceable. We can live without mass tourism and fast deliveries.

And yet they are part of the obvious low hanging fruit for reducing emissions

I don’t understand why they keep targeting art. Wouldn’t smashing car windows (for example!) make more sense?

Never seen that banner or an ad. I guess it’s just a matter of time though 😕

Elegant!

Another example of a multi-billion dollar company that doesn’t curate their products/services. Costs too much money they would only profit 234 billion instead of 244 billion.

In the long term it’s a terrible strategy. People will lose confidence and stop shopping there. I’ve almost stopped and I know I’m not the only one.

Not that most executives care about long term…

What makes the problem hard is that there are a lot of dickheads on both sides, not just the governments. You can be an oppressed victim AND a dick. These things are not mutually exclusive, unfortunately.

So this is the “moderate republican”. Good to know…

Per fuel/mile/cargo, aircraft are actually very efficient

Not really : https://ourworldindata.org/travel-carbon-footprint

Getting rid of these fees means they will be displayed in the overall cost, which might in turn reduce the number of people flying.

30€ flights (that you end up paying more due to these hidden costs) are definitely part of the problem.

“Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”

Yep, that’s pretty vague

I’m talking specifically about this “kimono” story. Being french, I also know what’s going on there.

You’re reading al Jazeera. There’s a good chance that there is a second side to this story.