The moon is like the lennyface of emojis

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Are we looking at different surveys? 6 core CPUs ate literally the most popular choice RN

I don’t think anyone was saying it’s impossible, just that it needs standardization. I imagine windows is more appealing to companies when it is easier to find admins than if they were to use some specific linux system where only a few people are skilled to manage it.

I agree, but I don’t think that’s gonna happen soon, sadly.

I guess they’re saying the workers will get lower pay/ no raises because of the increased operational costs.

My best guess would be that the customers will have to deal with higher prices, though.

If you (or any passerby) happens to like German hip hop, I can only recommend Pöbel MC.

There’s plenty of games with low hardware requirements

Having more beautiful and structured URLs. I suppose for those cases it’s more of a preference, and with the tooling I use (.NET) it’s not too difficult to achieve.

I guess my gripe with your original statement was that I was thinking mostly of state like user login etc. I have to concede it’s not totally garbage for the cases you mentioned.

omg thanks for this

have multiple routes point to the same endpoint, dynamically adding the parameters serverside

I disagree. I definitely prefer REST APIs that use the file path for searches, filters, sorting. You get most if not all benefits from query parameters, and if done correctly it is just as clearly readable as query params.

Oops, must have overlooked it. Thanks!

As a WebDev… URL parameters are definitely not the place to keep state… Were not in the 00’s anymore. They do have legit uses, but we have JS localStorage nowadays.

There was another app, but that was a closed beta and I just couldn’t find it until I searched for the full package name, not just the display name. So yeah, boost is th e only app I’m having issues with so far. Which really surprises me, too.

Oh, nice! That’s definitely valuable info. Personally, I do think it’s too much work to implement that properly, though.

Fair enough, I haven’t given that too much thought myself until now. After playing around with Firefox’s URL cleaning, I realized there are some parameters I want to keep. So, by clean I mean removing all unnecessary parameters in the URL.

For example, https://youtu.be/jNQXAC9IVRw would become https://youtu.be/jNQXAC9IVRw, but https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNQXAC9IVRw keeps it’s parameter, because it is necessary.

I guess replicating the logic for deciding which parameters to keep is not trivial, so the easiest solution is probably just manually pasting links into firefox, and just copying them cleanly from there. Thanks for providing some code, though!

ahh well, guess that is my !wooosh@lemmy.world moment of the day

The thing in the middle under the display? I’d assume its a scrolling wheel, kinda like on your mouse but very wide

Lmao took me a second but yeah, as always, not everything haha

Everything is an over generalization. Nothing is black and white. Only a sith deals in absolutes.