

Maybe because you tried to backdoor a sales pitch into a community where it wasn’t quite on topic, and the community members didn’t appreciate it?
CTRL+Z
Maybe because you tried to backdoor a sales pitch into a community where it wasn’t quite on topic, and the community members didn’t appreciate it?
If I were to ask my Magic 8 Ball “Is the word ‘difinitely’ misspelled?” 100 times, it’s going to reply in the affirmative over 16% of the time. Literally double. This would also be “the very first experiment in this use case, done by a single person on a model that wasn’t specifically designed for this.”
It’s not impressive.
The issue with hallucinations…
This is the real problem: working under the false assumption that there are two kinds of output. It’s all the same output. An LLM cannot hallucinate in the same way that it cannot think or reason. It’s fancy autofill. Predictive text.
You can use it to brainstorm creative solutions, but you need to treat its output for what it is: complicated dice rolls from the tables in the back of the Dungeon Masters Guide. A fun distraction. Implausible fantasy 9 times out of 10.
I bought a thing that said it was good for A and B but it’s only good for B. Marketing problem! I didn’t make a bad decision! I wasn’t tricked! I’m a smart boy!
In 100 runs only 8 correctly identify the targeted vulnerability, the rest are false positives or claim that there are no vulnerabilities in the given code. … [The] signal to noise ratio is very low, and one has to sift through a lot of wrong reports to get a realistic one.
It was right 8% of the time when presented the least amount of input to find a known bug. Then, when they opened it up to more of the codebase, its performance decreased.
I’m not going to use something that’s wrong over 92% of the time. That’s insane. That’s like saying my Magic 8 Ball “could be used as a useful tool for helping to detect vulnerabilities.” The fucking rubber ducky on my desk has a more reliable clearance rate.
The future of web development is XHTML. Get on or get left behind.
Transitional XHTML resulted in extremely organized (if verbose) DOMs and delivered features that took forever to show up in HTML5.
It also sniffed out the sociopaths who capitalize elements and close their tags out of order. Fucking …
<p><strong><em>Evidence of low moral character.</strong></em></p>
Reveal trailers: famously reliable sources of performance data.
If previously released Switch Pokémon games are any indication, “improved frame rates” means 30.
This is actually a technique to capture an honest answer from a respondent. Ask the same question a few different ways here and there, then take the average of the answers. (It could have been executed better in this survey, though.)
That way is old and busted, here’s the new hotness (anchor positioning).
I’d do my best to watch them in the order they were commercially released so you can appreciate how damaging and awful the edits are.
Hey, look, I found the one and only person who’s never had a problem with Comcast.
The man who killed Google search is required reading at this point.
The Stanley Parable: Ultra Deluxe Edition. It’s amazing.
I can’t get my drug dealer to text me back and these kids are getting freebies on Snapchat? Fucking bullshit.
Videogaming, porn and gambling gave boys such dopamine hits that anything else they did felt boring.
Kids these days don’t understand the rush of dumping their entire allowance into 15 minutes of Street Fighter, comitting borderline felonies while riding bicycles around the neighborhood, and then going into the woods to jerk it to that one Playboy before going over Steve’s house to worship the devil.
This was a great read
Please, boil the ocean to give me a pleasant, factually dubious reply.
Very many things!
Try Ghost.