No.

No wonder you require such projection and mental gymnastics.

when you don’t consider Palestinians as humans

Quick question, were the Israeli civilians who were killed in a mass killing spree on October 7th human, too?

I realise my other repeated question so far has been pretty tough and you’ve had to try to continuously dodge and deflect from it instead of just simply say the thing you actually think, but this one should be pretty simple and straightforward to just answer with a yes or no, right?? You kinda walked right into it, too, so.

Reading a full sentence is “hyper-examination” lmaoooooo okie dokie

But questioning the definiton of every word of it when it is plainly obvious isn’t hyper-examination 😂😂

Thanks for providing more examples of his consistent stance on this for me?? Literally supports my point. So again, what about it, exactly, do you disagree with?

That doesn’t make them not a troll spreading misinformation. My requirements for blocking are not “literal bot account”. Again, you are free to make your own choices about how to interact with the internet

against the horrific Hamas terrorist attack of October 7th, but it did not, and does not, have the right to go to war against the entire Palestinian people."

If you look closely, you’ll find there actually are more words that follow. Keep reading.

He did not say they “have” a right to defend themself, but “had” a right to defend themself against a specific event that occurred. He also makes clear that it is not a valid justification to go to war against all of Palestine.

What issue do you have with his statement, exactly?

You’re free to use your block button however you choose. To me this looks like a troll intentionally spreading misinformation. I have little benefit of the doubt left to give out to people posting on the internet

Block button exists for a reason. I’m using mine.

The “Israel has a right to defend itself” line is pure misinformation. Here’s his actual quote, in full:

“Israel, of course, had the right to defend itself against the horrific Hamas terrorist attack of October 7th, but it did not, and does not, have the right to go to war against the entire Palestinian people.”

because of credit card debt

wut, you’re the only one trying to make a comparison between credit card debt and the national debt. They aren’t comparable things, FYI…

wooooooosh. That wasn’t the comparison.

Also Norway is literally the prime example of when a sovereign wealth fund works and makes sense… They have a massive… wait for it… SURPLUS… due to their nation’s natural resources (oil)

If you say so

😂 my man, I literally pointed out a trope of superhero films… this is like if I pointed out how cartooN physics is different than real life, “ACHTUALLY CARTOONS DO A PRETTY DECENT JOB BECAUSE THINGS STILL FALL DOWN”… 🤦

You are fooling yourself about Marvel movies doing a decent job of addressing societies ills, though. They’re literally marketed to the widest audience and lowest common denominator possible, but I guess what one considers a “decent job” is pretty subjective. That’s fine though, they’re cashgrab mass market movies, no one expects anything more.

And it just doesn’t seem like you know or understand what a sympathetic villain is… it doesn’t mean they are “right” or not actually a villain… 🤦

That complaint has no merit, because it can be applied to almost every film ever. Why didn’t Andy Dufresne start a riot and force prison reform? Why didn’t Simba implement a social welfare program for the hyenas who helped murder his father? Why are all these high school students going to high school instead of starting a revolution?

Um… what?? Andy Dufresne didn’t have super special awesome magic powers…? Lmao. And the Simba question is honestly a good one. Why didn’t he? He’s literally their ruler with that authority.

Patently false.

😂 that cracked me up

Yeah of course they can, like I can open and fund an IRA while underwater on credit card debt…

Any nation can also have policies that are bad or stupid or horrific.

Because that’s where the money that is put into the fund comes from. Otherwise you’re putting in money that should probably be used to balance the deficit.

Those are for nations running a surplus, not a deficit.

Lmao wow what a cool-headed response.

So you judge the movies without seeing them and you respond to my comment without reading it?

I’ve seen them and I’ve read your comment. 🤷

First of all, most of the villains don’t have sympathetic goals.

Um… they are literally more often than not complex villains designed to be sympathetic to the audience, doing things “the wrong way” for reasons that the audience can relate to. Sure, you can cherry pick the one of few that are just evil because, like red skull. How about killmonger, thanos, the green goblin, doc oc, gorr the god butcher, magneto, ra’s al ghul. Even the example you provide, Loki, is one of these sympathetic villains.

Tony Stark’s whole character arc in the first movie is about reforming his life to make the world a better place.

In all of the Iron Man movies it plays out as a cover for his ego issues and trying to prove to Pepper Potts that his ego feeding is worth all the trouble he has caused in their relationship, it isn’t until End Game when he sacrifices himself that he completes the arc and acts with selfless motivation.

Did you miss Falcon and the Winter Soldier, where Captain America gives a big speech saying exactly what you are saying, that they need to do more to address the problems that created the villains?

Great that this theme was featured once in an unpopular one season show that only on Disney+ … totally applies to all the movies and changes their underlying themes

And then… like… after his big speech… did he do it? 🤔

Your points only go skin deep and are surface level details of these films. These superhero stories are ultimately about maintaining the status quo. They never use their super special awesome powers to bring about meaningful or real change that would benefit their societies and never address the underlying issues that drive the “bad guys” to do “bad guy stuff”.

AMD GPUs are well supported by many LLM frameworks. I’d recommend ollama

Your intuition about this is not accurate. 24GB is more than enough for running local image generation and training a LoRA. You also don’t need an insane amount of data; a LoRA is generally trained with less than 100 images, usually around 15-30 images.

To do deepfakes, you’re not training an entire brand new image model from scratch, which is only within reach of big organizations, you’re just adapting an existing model that is publicly available. You can do this for free with open source tools. It is within reach of anyone with high-end gaming hardware or anyone willing to pay for some cheap cloud compute.

Further, LoRAs for most celebrities and famous people have already been trained and can be found on the internet for free, so the training step is likely not even necessary in most cases.

And someone like JD Vance is almost always using the same expression in the same light.

If this is the case, then images generated with the same expression in the same light will not look out of place.

But you will still be able to generate images with other lighting and facial expressions, even without sample images for them, because the base image model that is being adapted already “understands” differing facial expressions and lighting and can apply them to the subject of the LoRA, in the same way that it can combine random concepts together to create something “new” that wasn’t present in the training images (eg a painting of a zombie unicorn in the style of a specific painter)

I would disagree with MBFC’s opinion that RFA’s credibility is “High” or that its bias is left leaning