• paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Hypothetically:

    If he did it. And if he stashed the gun. And then the cops planted a gun. Could he recount the events on the stand and reveal he stashed the gun, thus proving the cops are attempting to frame him?

    This is nonsense. But, hypothetically…

    • meco03211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      Bad move. Your right to remain silent doesn’t mean you get to pick and choose which questions you answer on the stand should you choose to testify. Instead he could give plenty of information to his lawyer who could then rabidly attack the planted gun and prove malfeasance.

        • meco03211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          … in reference to the right to remain silent, that’s wrong. Miranda rights don’t cover double jeopardy so technically they aren’t exactly the same. But effectively they are.

        • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          If the judge tells you that your “right to stfu” doesn’t apply in this situation and that you must legally answer the question, then you either answer the question or get held in contempt until you do. And that CAN be held against you.

    • Tire@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      The court is capable of calling out more than one person. It could send him to prison for the original crime and also charge the police with a separate crime of trying to frame him.