TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works to Firefox@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days ago"the only browser that's not evil" What are your thoughts?sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up111arrow-down114file-text
arrow-up1-3arrow-down1image"the only browser that's not evil" What are your thoughts?sh.itjust.worksTriflingToad@sh.itjust.works to Firefox@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square10fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareCrayonDevourer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 days agoI’d say they’re still not evil, they unfortunately just let themselves be captured by an evil company to keep them afloat.
minus-square𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down2·2 days agoAny company who pays their CEO $6.9 million dollars - a thousand times the salary of their lowest white-collar employee - can’t claim to be not evil.
minus-squareBahnd Rollard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-22 days agoGoogle does that because you cant use Safari if your not on a fruit device and the feds will dust off the anti-trust book and throw it at them ar mach 6 otherwise.
I’d say they’re still not evil, they unfortunately just let themselves be captured by an evil company to keep them afloat.
Any company who pays their CEO $6.9 million dollars - a thousand times the salary of their lowest white-collar employee - can’t claim to be not evil.
Google does that because you cant use Safari if your not on a fruit device and the feds will dust off the anti-trust book and throw it at them ar mach 6 otherwise.