Your case clearly supports full-size cards not half-height. You can usually buy whichever bracket you need if it’s a common card.

I’d say they’re still not evil, they unfortunately just let themselves be captured by an evil company to keep them afloat.

Joke’s on you, I was already stupid to begin with.

Yes, it can be enough to do this.

Get on Reddit at work? If you share any public internet with literally ANY other Reddit troll who’s been banned, they just simply saw your IP address matched, and banned you because of that connection.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Firefox users didn’t want this shit in the first place. Good riddance.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

If you continue going to the buffet with shit, that’s on you. There are plenty of them without shit. You’re just a vegan luddite at this point. You don’t wanna eat animals, so you expect everyone around you to also not eat animals because it’s against your beliefs.

Sorry. Not how the world works. AI is here to stay because it’s useful to people. Whine and bitch and moan all you want, it’s not going away.

You have the ability to choose an insurance company that doesn’t use those things. Hell, you even have the ability to self-insure in most states with enough collateral. Nothing is being forced on you. Hell - you EVEN have the ability to hire an in-person insurance agent – did you know that?

Sure, it’s not as cheap - but you’ve always been able to do this. You are not being forced like you claim, your own ignorance is what betrays you to the options you have available.

And what other people do with their ingestion of AI is their business, not yours.

Without AI, all of the things you say they are doing WITH AI were already possible. They could ALREADY spy on employees. They could ALREADY lie and manipulate people. All AI does is make it happen on a wider scale.

So instead of attacking “AI” “AI” “AI”…why not attack the things that are being done wrong, rather than the fact that it’s AI?

Nobody is forcing you to do anything by their use of AI. You don’t have a right to TikTok not having things made with AI because you have the freedom to simply not use TikTok. Just as an example.

No, because you use the uppermost-bound of the statement. Your opinion doesn’t take precident as the opinion above it (polluting the river) already violates the rights of others. Your opinion literally is the same as mine. That the person polluting the river (their opinion being they can) - shouldn’t be able to use that opinion to affect others. You’re saying the same as I am, but focused on the wrong part.

Like with religion – You’re free to believe whatever you want to believe. That you’re not allowed to have abortions, etc.

But the moment YOUR belief, says that I can’t have an abortion, is when it becomes invalid, because it’s not MY belief. I don’t have to abide by YOUR belief/opinion on the matter. Your opinions don’t dictate my actions.

Now, you can control your actions - by, say - not buying from me. You control your actions, so while you can’t force companies not to AI, there’s nothing forcing you to buy from them when you are aware of its use. You can’t stop them from using it because you don’t like it though. Your opinion of it being good/bad, or if they can/should/shouldn’t use it matters absolutely none.

Yeah, that’s what I thought.

Is that because you can’t pinpoint it yourself? There’s a reason that you can’t. It’s because no contradiction exists.

Have you thought about this for more than 2 seconds?

Have YOU? - Your example is clearly them violating the rights of others. This isn’t some paradox point of view or the “got ya!” moment that you think it is.

Oh no, people are assaulting me with their different opinions!

No - you can’t say no. People have a right to use AI in their productions, and your opinion cannot force them to do otherwise.

As with anything - the moment your opinion starts to dictate other people’s lives, it becomes invalid.

Did bush actually have time for what’s claimed here? He was mostly about removing rights from Americans in the face of a sham war. I don’t think he actually had much focus on tax breaks for rich people…

Obama continued that ritual, removing even more rights from the American people under the guise of “safety”. And Obama could have shoved Universal healthcare through but didn’t - he watered it down in the name of “bipartisanship”, but then ultimately nobody voted for the bill on the right anyways. If that were going to be the case, he should have just rammed through what the American people NEEDED; but he didn’t – because he wanted MORE MONEY FOR RICH PEOPLE (insurance companies)

Hell, Obama bombed more brown people than any president before him as well…let’s not pretend he was an angel.