• Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    So this is in the NYT? NBC? ABC? . . uh . . . VanityFair? . … no? Nothing eh.

    Yeah that sounds about right.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s not like Thou Shalt Not Kill is a Ten Commandment or Something. Otherwise it would be REALLY AWKWARD when Republican States FORCE Kids to Read it in Class!

    • Anomalocaris@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      come on, cite the whole verse

      Thow shall not kill unless they are poor, brown, gay, trans, black, asian, Muslim, or whatever, then do whatever you want.

      Exodus 20:13 new Trump bible

    • Cosmoooooooo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      They are. They have plans, and they’re working on it. It’s a perfect way for them to spread influence globally. It worked for the US for decades, until a Russian operative shut it down to make the US look bad.

      China may stand to gain more by letting a few million die first, showing that the US isn’t the global leader that it once was. I can’t imagine this is a small-scale operation, and it could take time to set up.

      I don’t care who feeds the people, as long as they get food. Cancelling food aid out of nowhere with multiple commitments already made? That’s just shitty business.

      • ToastedRavioli@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        China has more of a reputation for indebting poorer countries to them, and just buying debt in general from as many countries as possible.

        I imagine they are looking at this less as an opportunity to fill the gap with soft power, and more of an opportunity to push desperate countries into debt with them. Our soft power moves were preventing that from being necessary in the way it will be now

        Theyve basically financially colonized a lot of Africa at this point already, even when we were sending a lot of aid there. Its massively beneficial for China to have as much control/leverage as possible over the countries that supply raw materials for their manufacturing economy

        China has played the long game for longer than most countries have even existed. Rich countries owe them and buy everything from them. Poorer countries owe them and sell everything to them

      • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I would love China to step into that peace protest. They should have been leading the discussion since the 1990s as they have no horse in this race at all.

  • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’ve got it! I figured it out! They are killing off Americans so that the ratio of Americans to imigrants goes down, and they can show a trend over time of the invasion. That’s the key. They can’t force people to cross the border to fit their fiction, so they are killing Americans to inflate the numbers.

    I’m not even gonna add the /s to this because there is a non-zero chance I’m right.

  • Binturong@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    I death per dollar paid to Stormy Daniels, roughly. I don’t believe in coincidences in politics anymore.

      • arrow74@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        But let’s pretend for a moment that they’re right. Is building political capital in developing nations by helping feed their people, provide medicine, and develop their cities a bad thing?

        Like dollar per dollar you get a country with a positive view of your nation for very little cost. Even if we wanted to ignore the obvious moral imperatives and just the general goodness of feeding the hungry, it’s good foreign policy

        Even when the right makes up a boogieman they’re still wrong

        • Machinist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah, that’s what blows my mind about this. From a purely business greed perspective, cutting all the USAID food and medical is a dumb move that reduces your power.

          Al Capone was famous for his charity.

          I was also amazed when they shut down Voice of America. That’s the main open propaganda arm of the US military and the Federal government targeted largely at foreign citizens. It was priceless in influencing foreign populations.

          is it really Russian influence or are they truly that fucking stupid? I can’t decide.

        • krolden@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Because when they dont want to privatize their power grid we will just threaten to cut off aid

      • madcat@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        This is a right wing talking point.

        No, that’s a fact. It was mainly used for bribery of foreign politicians and officials.

    • lividweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yeah, fuck USAID for using that money to [checks notes] rebuild in disaster areas, increase the yield of crops in impoverished regions, and distribute vaccines…