And it seems karmacourt will be the first to posit that the fediverse is worth “putting in its place”, going by the upvotes in such an empty community that probably discourages those kinds of suits.
And it seems karmacourt will be the first to posit that the fediverse is worth “putting in its place”, going by the upvotes in such an empty community that probably discourages those kinds of suits.
Context for those unaware:
“A friend of mine” OP is referring to Call Me Leni, who was banned from several instances and communities for being a KiwiFarms member, among other things, and OP has a grudge against the Fediverse for this. Leni shouldn’t have linked their KiwiFarms posts on Lemmy, and linked Lemmy threads talking about them on their KiwiFarms account. That wasn’t very bright of them.
Proof 1
Proof 2
Modlog
Call me Leni also defended KiwiFarms as a “free speech” site and tried to conflate the hate site with Discord:
I take it OP feels like the Fediverse is violating “free speech” for banning KiwiFarms members.
I’m not her. We went over this in my last post you visited. You are just stalking at this point. What grudge do you have against me anyways? Is it not clear we are talking about a common subject?
As for the rest, anyone can click a link within a link.
This is fucking hysterical. You realize the person you’re replying to didn’t say you were Call Me Leni? You denying it without accusation like that is uh… not a great look!
This shit’s hilarious. They’re so deep in the “just asking for a friend” trope, that they get defensive pre-emptively, therefore giving up the game.
I will say for sure, Leni sure does a lot of random “friends” who routinely pop up on the same social media she hangs out in, to defend her with a massive amount of insider knowledge. I barely get my friends to even look at memes on fediverse I sent them :D. Leni has the most obsessive and dedicated “friends” in the world, I’ll tell ya.
It is way, way past my bedtime, and my meds wore off, so out of curiosity I clicked through to the link on Reddit again and…
Yeah there’s no way that the user who submitted this to ‘court’ isn’t the same fucking person. I’m going to quote a post they made to /r/Lemmy. I don’t recommend trying to read it, but if you do… yeah they’re all the same person. I’m done playing nice about it. See if this doesn’t read in the exact same terrible, unreadable way:
First of all, no one is asking this individual to represent their instance, let alone a few instances. Second, the top comment to that is literally identical to the top comments on almost everything this person writes:
Godspeed, /u/triangularRectum420. You represent us all today.
And CraigOhMyEggo copped a ban from Santabot on slrpnk for being an alt of Leni. That’s enough for me.
The solarpunk bot banned me for a DM. None of us here are one person. If this is you playing nice, I’d be curious to know what your mean side looks like.
Read my reply to see why I said. It wasn’t pre-emptive. I was “obsessive” about a number of people, she wasn’t unique.
Uh, yes he did. And he has made that accusation in the past.
I don’t care about an accusation made in the past. I was responding to you denying an accusation that wasn’t made in this post. You were denying it without accusation here. You can’t, and shouldn’t, expect the readers in this thread to be aware of any conversations you’ve had in the past, and if you’re going to defend against those, it should either be made clear that they weren’t made here, or you should defend against those comments where they were made.
Because, in absence of that claim here, as I said, you’re defending against an accusation that wasn’t made here.
Eta: You copped a ban from Santa on slrpnk.net for being an alt of CallMeLeni, so that uh… seems to lend it some credence.
Simple comprehension error. Someone corrected me. Not even the point.
The solarpunk bot banned me for a DM.
Love the petty bullshit of all your replies to me telling you off, which were correct, including links to the same comment where someone says I could’ve made my point clearer.
Congrats. You found one person who says your reading comprehension might be understandable, out of the entirety of the rest of the commenters here, who all tell you to stop with your bullshit crusade… and your reaction is to passive-aggressively try and shoehorn their one comment into every single other thing you reply to me with.
I’m going to tell you, even though you refuse to listen- “engagement” isn’t a metric of success. If 300 people tell you to shut up, that isn’t 300 new friends. That’s “you are wrong,” writ large. And since you don’t understand this either, on any of these other posts you make- people stopping replying to you also doesn’t somehow make your points true. It just means you’re more exhausting than entertaining.
This is to just to say, I’m done here. I’m going to go back to blissfully ignoring you until your next bullshit move to try and defend Leni, at which point I’ll probably link whatever new folks are stumbling on your ongoing nonsense to this thread. Or any others. Goodbye. Enjoy your meaningless reply. I won’t be answering it.
If “engagement” isn’t a metric of success, why do you maintain the numbers of people telling me to shut up is a metric of the need to be quiet? Especially when my only intent here was to share something I thought would fit the community, not to “crusade”? If 95% of the people in dbzer0 are those who will feel angst over every little thing, by your logic, does that make it a bad community? Because I can see through yours.
Your reading comprehension is shit. He did not accuse you of being the leni person. Reread what he wrote.
I figured that out just now.
OP in that case, the commentor could have made it more clearer, refers to the Reddit post not you.