• Perspectivist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’d say killing a person because you were drunk driving is worse offence than killing someone because you fell a sleep but neither of them are intentional. If he did this because he hates cyclists it would be a whole another story.

    • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      But why is it a worse offense? In both cases you have plenty of notice that you’re driving impaired. One could argue it’s worse for tired drivers because their judgement isn’t clouded by an intoxicating substance that impairs judgement.

      • Perspectivist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’d argue that virtually every driver has at some point driven while tired to some degree, but most have never driven drunk. Driving drunk shows poor judgment not only when you get behind the wheel, but also when you started drinking without considering you might need to drive later. You can’t really blame someone for suffering from insomnia - but you can blame them for drinking.

    • baines@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      even an accident this big deserves more unless it was outside his control

      if nothing else that license should be suspended way longer

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      If he did this because he hates cyclists it would be a whole another story.

      It would? How much shorter would you prefer his sentence to be if he did it out of hatred for cyclists?