I think it’s pretty safe to say that the majority of us are here to avoid another corporate takeover of our preferred platforms. It would seem to me to be a tad irresponsible to allow Facebook into our space with open arms, allowing them to hoover up our data. I would love to keep using Lemmy.world, but will happily change instances if need be, and I feel many share that sentiment.

  • Chenzo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, the more I think about this, I feel like keeping Threads will pull more people FROM there than it will push people away from Lemmy… once they learn what the fediverse is.

    Anyone that’s on Lemmy **now ** isn’t going to go over to Threads.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Meta have yet to prove they can actually implement it though. I feel like we’re worried about a theoretical, rather than an inevitability.

    • USA ONE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lemmy.world benefits from threads and it allows a massive pool of users to subscribe to communities.

      • Microw@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That is currently impossible though and we have no indication whatsoever that Threads will implement that part of the protocol