deleted by creator

It’s German, and you’re about as right as anyone trying to say a German word in English can expect to get.

Some of the flickering can be gotten rid of by disabling hardware-acceleration for qtwebengine.

I’ve got
`export QTWEBENGINE_DISABLE_GPU_THREAD=1

export QTWEBENGINE_CHROMIUM_FLAGS=“–disable-gpu-compositing --num-raster-threads=1 --enable-viewport --main-frame-resizes-are-orientation-changes --disable-composited-antialiasing”`
in .bashrc.

Note that there is still enough flickering left to annoy, and some (appimage?) apps dont seem to register the setting.

You know, that’s a good idea anyway.

I wonder though what that would mean for the copyright?

In Denmark the case surrounding “Nøddebo præstegård” caused copyright to be enacted.

I’ve noticed the theme come up in other countries, amongst these France, but I’ll grant that I may have overestimated its importance by overfitting to prior knowledge.

The purpose of copyright in the USA, and as far as I know in Brittain, yes.

But please remember that in much of the rest of the world copyright is a reaction to people, creators, getting in trouble over third party usage of their creations.

Leading to the idea that a creator should have the power to stop people from using their works for whatever the creator deems objectionable.

Mr Musk is trying to figure out how to get in worse trouble than what he’s already in with Twitter?

Reasonable presentation, not that difficult to follow.

Free

But I would point out that I haven’t tried any of that other options to learn AI, so can’t really compare.

Maybe check fast.ai out?

Deterrence and prevention are different from post facto responce, and show of force is different from application of force.

Consider what went wrong in Afghanistan, Iraq, Vitenam. Consider how many Indian lives it took to end the Indian wars the hard way. Consider the Black and Tans in Ireland. Consider what happened when the Nazis slaugthered whole villages. Consider the Sovietunion in that war (27 million lost out of a total population of 200 million)

Now find the cases, please, where actually sending the troops in helped in something like this.

And then take note of how limited the deployment were, or how special the circumstances.

“Israel must respond in a severe heavy-handed way if they are to dissuade any further attacks and keep their people safe”

This newer works!

Simple as that. Look at the evidence, please. This always leads to further violence, and ultimately mass slaugther.

The European definition of rule of law requires that the law is predictable; something it wouldn’t be if you can’t find it or can’t read it.

Which means you can just look for the European announcement of such things and read that.

Now, I’m not complaining about you, but fuck those two rags, that didn’t see the need to link to their sources!

The Japanese attitude seems to be that if there’s a way to increase the likelihood that the alert will go through, then they will do that too.

This is Europe of course, but I’m fairly confident that I might successfully challenge the schools right to know my childs sex.

That’s none of their business.

And you mentioning koreader, and a helpful discussion of the topic on koreaders github, helped me finally find an open source reader that does vertical text correctly.

Thorium, sadly not koreader, does Japanese vertical writing correctly and I’m very happy right now.

It’s a very apt demonstration of “non-hateful” hate-speech.

Under Danish law, if I make a happening for the purpose of making the local stamp collectors association, or anyone lose their collective cool and attack me, I will be dragged away and fined for disturbing the peace.

I really see no reason why stamp collectors should be differently protected than Muslims.

I would agree, however, that both stamp collectors and Muslims should be required to keep their cool, and that we should not enjoy any such protections against mere insult.

On the other hand this guy does his best to shove the burning stamps up the noses of the collectors, …

And authorities in Muslim countries abuse this to divert attention from their own abuses.

So yeah, I don’t know, it’s complicated.

Ah, but it isn’t really about religion.

It’s a simple question of who can ‘othered’? Who can be designated as victims?

So it’s not other religious groups, but specifically muslims.

It should be noted that the muslim idea of what the Koran is seems to put it on a significantly higher pidestal than where Christains place the Bible.

Higher even than what the more unhinged fringes of the sola scriptura crowd does.

And here in Denmark there’s a double standard where behaviour, that would result in being dragged away and fined if you insulted any other group, is just fine as long as you target muslims.

All of which is not to say that Erdogan isn’t also an asshole.

But then Erdogan is not quite all muslims.

Why do I get the impression that most of the commenters here haven’t noticed that the wider fediverse, and of course kbin.social, are made as an attempt to solve this exact problem.

You’re here because we’re trying to fix this!

I’d put my money on spritely.institute rather than the current system, but whatever; we are trying!