• IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Until the slaves start facing starvation or hunger, they’ll never revolt.

        • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          3 months ago

          That isn’t the point. The point is that a single heavily armed guard is enough to deter a hundred people from even trying to fight until they are desperate.

          The point is that, even though those hundred people would win a fight, and even if they know it themselves, those hundred people are individuals. Unless they are desperate, none of those individuals are willing to stick their neck out to fight.

          We see this in prisons. We saw this under slavery. We saw this in concentration camps. A few armed people are sufficient to suppress lots of unarmed people. Sometimes the unarmed revolt, and when they do, they often succeed if they are willing to take massive casualties. That doesn’t change the fact that they rarely try to revolt in the first place.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          not that I’m encouraging it but I’m kind of surprised that there hasn’t been more violent attacks on ice officers

          My comment is condemning the violence mentioned above, regardless of motive.

          Violent response vilifies the citizen against the officer ‘doing their job.’ That is leveraged to strengthen laws that protect officers, used as more propaganda to grow support for the right, and costs us another resister to incarceration.

          People need to stop suggesting response with emotion and read history. Small scale resistance against fascism has never been successful.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I’m fully aware of your personal disclosure. That’s why I wrote “people” and not “you.” I was answering your question. Are you always condescending when you don’t understand the context of a reply?

              • Gerald of Hillwood@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                Oh man, this is the same guy that told me to stop saying what I want to say (oppress my right to free speech) and then resorted to childish name-calling (called me an ass). A bully just like trump. Dude’s all mixed up.

                I don’t care if someone disagrees with me. I’ll listen to someone who can make valid points, but that’s not what a bully does.