In three weeks, Donald Trump has imploded whatever positive image the United States might have had internationally.

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Trump is creating a lot of enemies. Even turning allies into enemies. The reputation usually mostly recovers when there’s a Democrat in the WH, but since American voters walked right back into the same chaos again, eyes wide open, it’s going to be a lot harder to recover this time around. There’s just very little trust and credibility left.

  • Reneesme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    5 days ago

    America’s wealth is tied up in perceptions. When the rest of the world views America the way I currently view Tesla, we’re going to have some very big economic problems. And of course we already have huge security and safety issues as blow back for turning on our allies. It’s impossible for me to imagine this isn’t all a deliberate attempt to destroy America. And we all know which world leader Trump worships who is very very interested in causing that.

  • pachrist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I feel like saying it’s normal for empires to fall due to external causes is not accurate? It’s usually the exception. Maybe the external factor is the final kick, knocking over a rotting house of cards, but the cause is almost always division, internal conflict, or unsustainable growth. An empire is much more likely to collapse under its own weight than it is to have Alexander the Great kick its teeth in. The Ottoman Empire was called “The Sick Man of Europe” for a reason.

    • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s absolutely not. It’s their very internal policies that force them into destroying themselves. They start believing their own propaganda. For both Rome and Constantinople it was wasting huge amounts of it’s power on fighting Persia and trying to extend its borders in ways that outran it’s logistics capacity. For the Ottomans it was the rise of nationalism and their ham fisted attempts to combat it. For the modern Western imperialists it was the base fact that direct colonial rule was always a monetary drain for the state and only made businesses money. Making these stupid decisions was because each empire had created a web of political commitments and internal propaganda that was unsustainable.

      • RufusFirefly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 days ago

        The Roman Empire took centuries to eventually collapse and a lot of it was corruption, hyperinflation, and complacency. It’s happening here but at a much quicker rate.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Maybe the external factor is the final kick, knocking over a rotting house of cards, but the cause is almost always division, internal conflict, or unsustainable growth.

          Rome was a place where power consolidated, but the various eras might as well have been different empires.

          The system collapsed, dissolved, reconstituted, and expanded several times during the 1400 years it existed.

          Same with China. 5000 years of history emerging from Beijing, but each dynasty was distinct.

          Even the US has reinvented itself several times over by now. Antebellum America might as well have been a different country. New Deal America was radically different from it’s Coolidge Era predecessor. Reagan’s America became it’s own thing in turn. Trumpian America is a new thing, not an end point.

        • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          They did, and were so weak and ineffectual afterwards that they even got sacked by the crusaders. It was essentially a long decline.

    • Shadywack@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Anacyclosis, Polybius was motivated by the fall of the Hellenistic society. When Rome conquered Greece it was unfathomable to them that they could ever even be conquered, let alone so quickly. They were swept aside in such a rapid fashion that it was a cultural shock.

      The US has this image of being unassailable, but the reality is that apathy is the greatest enemy we have ever faced. We have no faith in our leadership, and we’re short on supply of actual warriors despite what the keyboard warriors would have everyone thing.

      All the gun toting rednecks driving large pickup trucks shrink when they’re actually confronted with anything, and we’ve devolved into a system of cowards.

      The day America stands up and puts the ruling class heads on spikes, that’s the day the rest of the world should fear, but the rest of the world can just live comfortably knowing we’re all weak and worthless.

      Seriously, just look up “peopleofwalmart”, that’s the insanely low bar we go by these days.

    • commander@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      but the cause is almost always division, internal conflict, or unsustainable growth.

      I refer to it as atrophy. Once it becomes easier and more profitable for the empire to exploit its own populace instead of others, this is what we get.

    • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      LOL empire. They haven’t lasted for even a century. It will be a footnote in history.

        • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          This fucker just swings at everyone.

          I think someone shit on their waffle this morning.

            • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 days ago

              Well then, enlighten me and tell me exactly from when to when you consider them an empire?

              • Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 days ago

                Probably from the moment of our emancipation from England. Occupied more territory than most European states ever had at that moment.

                If you want to be pedantic about it how about when we occupied the width of an entire contenant? September 9th 1850

                We didn’t spring fully formed from Zeus’s forehead to fund the destruction of the Reich.

                • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 days ago

                  from the moment of our emancipation from England.

                  I was asking from what year, decade even to what year. This is as vague as it gets. If I wanted to be pedantic I would ask what a “contenant” is. That date you mention is about California? I think you don’t get what being an empire means. It’s not having a really big country.

            • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              As a country. Britain, Spain, Portugal have been around for much longer as a country. That period is not as long as they have existed in the capacity or form of being an ‘empire’.

          • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            1787 was less than 100 years ago? Because that’s when their Constitution was ratified.

            Also their revolutionary war was 1776 to 1783.

            How wrong are you willing to be?

            • BenVimes@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              They may be referencing the USA’s increased international hegemony starting after WWII rather than the founding of the nation.

  • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    5 days ago

    In just over three weeks, Donald Trump has been able to redefine the United States’ position in the world from a global power to an international outcast.

    This is exactly what people uttering “Make America Great Again” were asking for when they chose Trump to be the figurehead. None should be surprised.

    • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      As a European I’m all for it. Fuck up your own country for once and leave the rest alone. Nobody needs the corrupt self-declared policeman of the world

  • Drusas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    The Roman Empire fell because of a series of invasions by “barbarian tribes.”

    I cannot take this author seriously after they wrote this. It was, you know, just a little more complicated than that.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I don’t think the author meant that seriously. You see the quote around “barbarian tribes”? I think he considered this notion sarcastically, as this is “barbarian tribes” is often used by people less knowledgeble abou the topic.

      And for the US to implode within a few weeks, there must have been considerable rot inside. I am really not sure where precisely it started, but I consider Bretton Woods (both the system and it’s breakdown), Nixon with the final breakdown of honor in politics, Reagan and his “trickle-down economy” lie Reageanomics, and Bush Junior with his Gulf War key milestones in that process. Notice a trend? They were all Republicans. That Trump puts the final nail into the US’ coffin is only consequential.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Isn’t it crazy for Nixon to be a point of honor? Recent presidents have gotten away with a lot worse, but there is no resignation in dishonor, there are no consequences, nobody cares any more

        This is actually a big part of what keeps pushing me farther left. The party of righteousness, fairness, strict legal enforcement, strictly adhering to the constitution, was always dishonest but they’ve completely dropped any pretenses in favor of outright criminality, corruption, throwing out the constitution, enriching their corporate benefactors. They no longer even pretend that oppression is about family values anymore or that we will be trickled upon

      • skibidi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        73
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s a rather complex topic, but the short answer isn’t barbarian invasion.

        The simplest correct answer is the Roman elite became less interest in preserving the Roman state and more interested in increasing their own personal wealth and influence.

        • Carl@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          What’s wild is that “being Roman” persisted a lot longer than the tax system and patronage networks that had collapsed. It wasn’t until a large portion of the people who thought of themselves as “Roman” were invaded by the Eastern Roman Empire that the Roman identity was broken up, to be replaced by the regional identities that people rallied around to defend themselves.

          I feel like if the ERE’s leaders had taken a different approach, they could have stitched the Western Empire back together, but they broke it.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            That’s potentially a global problem. It’s not specific to the US as long as we keep making ourselves an attractive destination for immigrants and keep welcoming them ………… crap

          • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            define “enough kids” for me please.

            do you mean enough kids that their parents can’t feed them off their own little farm, and the kids had to be sent to the cities as slave / poor workers, so that the machines can keep churning for the sake of profit?

            edit: sorry but i’m pissed and angry now. “not enough kids” like what? not enough kids to make sausage of them? not enough kids to burn them in the kettle of capitalism? not enough kids to flood the labor market with undervalued workers?

            i tell you what, it’s capitalist propaganda that “people should have more kids”, because they think it makes the wages fall. what it actually does is create poverty, mass unemployment, working poor, and civil unrest. may the empire be intoxicated by its own poison. may the corporations fall due to the civil unrest that they helped create.

            • rabber@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              Like the birth rate was too low overall.

              Of course more people makes wages fall. That’s why immigration is so popular in western world.

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        It all started with the reform known as the Pax Romana. Rome stopped waging wars that kept the influx of slaves, which were fundamental for their economic model. They didn’t realize the implications of such a decision and didn’t design a viable alternative in time.

        • Snowclone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          6 days ago

          it took 100 or so years to really collapse and effective organization and leadership were big factors in that process. They didn’t lose a war and poof, everything was over, they were always fighting several other civilizations for dominance, they started consistently losing when the soldiers started showing up in rags.

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 days ago

    The United States is imploding. The reign of Donald Trump is not only challenging and threatening the very foundations of its constitutional democracy, it is calling into question the U.S.’s post-World War II hegemonic role. Empires or hegemonic powers rise and fall. Often they are defeated by emerging powers. Sometimes their decline takes place over time. But rarely do they self-destruct as spectacularly as the U.S. is doing. The U.S. implosion is dramatic in its intensity and rapidity. In just over three weeks, Donald Trump has been able to redefine the United States’ position in the world from a global power to an international outcast. Despite whatever military and economic power the U.S. still has, its image and global leadership have been undermined by President Trump’s foreign policy decisions.

    I just want to take a short, though probably unpopular, note that while you present it as something negative, to some people on the world, that’s actually something positive. There are communities all over the world who have suffered tremendously through the US’ global hegemony; and these people (me included) are sometimes actually in a very good mood about the news that have been coming the last few weeks.

  • Ronno@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    If there was anything the US was good at, it would be marketing. Creating the image that it’s the greatest nation on earth, influencing mainstream media to tell their version of the story, keeping up appearances of a strong nation.

    The moment these smoke clears and the mirrors break, that is when we see the real US. I think we have Trump to thank to show it to us.

    • LouNeko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 days ago

      Once, the US was actualy very food at funding innovation. The shit that Bell Labs alone discovered are things that shape the world today. But in the nature of US capatialism, if discovery can’t turn I to profit, why bother? It’s easier to market 2nd or 3rd place as 1st, then to actually be the 1st, especially if the Chinese are constantly breathing down you neck.

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        One of the stories about the US that I find inspirational is how, during the space race, NASA relied on various experts from somewhat unconventional places. It’s what I always think about at times like this, because it’s a snippet of what I consider to be genuine greatness, amongst all the propaganda and geopolitical awfulness.

        The first example is how the Apollo spacesuits were sewn by seamstresses from an underwear company. This was because they needed craftspeople skilled enough to be able to reliably cut fabric and sew seams within a margin of error of a fraction of a millimetre. Whereas in regular garment manufacturing, you can typically tear out incorrect stitches and try again, this wasn’t possible for the spacesuit, so they needed to be perfect first time; many of the fabrics they were working on were so cutting edge that they needed to be locked away in a safe when not working on them. Synthetic fabrics were still fairly new, and this partly explains why an underwear manufacturer had seamstresses who were up to this challenge — the group of sewists who worked on the spacesuit were probably among the most experienced people in the world at sewing synthetic fabrics, and this experience allowed them to be an active part of the design and manufacture process for the spacesuits.

        Another example from the same era is when NASA engineers were having difficulty getting the honeycomb insulating material they were using to adhere to the shuttle. This part of the program was happening near Seal Beach, in California, and when it was discovered that the local surfers were already experienced in using a material like this for their surfboards, NASA hired a bunch of the surfers to work with their engineers to figure out the problem. There’s a quote I absolutely adore from Donald Binns, a Project Engineer with North American Aviation[1]:

        “[The surfers] did a great job with it. The only downside of those guys was that when the surf was up, there was a big absentee problem — they were out there doing their trick.”

        I just find this incredibly sweet, because it captures both the strength and the difficulty of working with diverse skill sets. If ever there was greatness to be found in the US, we can see it in stories like this. I think this spirit of innovation has been lost over the years, due to the pressures of capitalism on individuals in particular.

        Edit: forgot to add link for quote citation

        [1]: Quote is from episode 1 of the 2008 documentary “Moon Machines”, accessible via the internet archive. Insulation section starts at around 16:45 https://archive.org/details/moon-machines/Moon+Machines+Part+1+The+Saturn+V+Rocket.mp4


        1. 1 ↩︎

      • Noodle07@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 days ago

        The education system has one goal: teach people critical thinking. In the US they deliberately did the opposite, that’s why there’s so many idiots. That and the fact that mass media is amazing at spewing propaganda

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Like, as much as i have to complain about the US meddled in other countries, i have to disagree that they only were good at marketing.

      Lots of technology have been developed in the US, primarily computer chips and everything that has to do with it, including the internet. That can be a good invention, depending on what you use it for.

      You should be fair and give credit where due, and part of the US’ power was because of technological proficiency. Of course, other countries also achieved good technological developments, like the Chinese with their solar panels, and the Europeans with lots and lots of scientific groundwork and cultural developments.

    • hansolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      92
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      It’s not “falling apart.” It’s being intentionally dismantled.

      Rubio’s statement at his conformation hearing was basically “the Post WWII order isn’t working for us, so we’re ending it.”

  • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    6 days ago

    As it should. The rise of fascism shouldn’t go unnoticed. The United States is capable of better but, the rot of capital needs to be expelled first.

    • commander@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s a cultural problem which is why Americans would rather have Trump over Bernie.

      Even liberals prefer this because Trump isn’t going to make any effort to reduce the disparity in wealth.

  • ehpolitical@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    I feel bad for the innocent Americans who are gonna suffer… people who honestly didn’t ask for or want any of this.

    • the_q@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      We may not have wanted any of this, but none of us are innocent. We all play our parts whether that’s the sociopathic capitalist or the empathetic commoner, with the consequences of our actions/inaction causing harm and suffering to the world. The very devices we’re having this discussion on were created with suffering.

      • ehpolitical@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        We’ve collectively destroyed this entire planet - that was intended to sustain us all - so none of us are innocent, except the children who’ve no idea yet what right and wrong even mean. As for the rest of us, there are very real degrees of guilt and also sincere ignorance, and also repentance… if not, we would all deserve to just lay down and let evil roll over us.

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      I mean the conservatives definitely asked for this, as did the democrats who didn’t vote, and the majority of Americans who don’t vote at all.

    • commander@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I mean, everyone who voted for Hillary/Biden in primaries wanted this.

      They would rather have Trump than Bernie, so that’s what they got.

  • uraniumcovid@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    say what you want about the brits, but they wouldn’t have voted for brexit twice.

    • Glytch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      83
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      If only she had retired when there was a chance to replace her with a progressive instead of hanging in until she died.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        “Progressive”!? I wouldn’t even be that optimistic. All she had to do was retire when her health was failing and Democrats could get someone fair and nonpartisan appointed.

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Obviously a very intelligent woman yet so fucking stupid at the end. I wonder if she wasn’t already in the clutches of dementia when she decided Hilary was certain to win.

      • leadore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Sadly that’s what power does to people. It’s more addictive than crack, they can’t let go.

    • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      One, she should of retired under Obama, and two, the US has failed as a country since bush stole the 2000 election and nobody did shit about it.

      • Bacano@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        6 days ago

        Didn’t Obama have a chance to name a justice and kicked the can until Trump got there? These clowns are working for the same corporate circus.

        Some say the US failed when it allowed Nixon to get away Scott free.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Didn’t Obama have a chance to name a justice and kicked the can until Trump got there?

          Why the fuck are you blaming that on Obama instead of McConnell? That’s some fucking blatant spin.

          • leadore@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            6 days ago

            Wow, so history is already being rewritten to change it into Obama fucking around and not bothering to nominate a Justice (the fondest dream of every president), instead of knowing that McConnell who was Senate majority leader (repubs controlled the Senate), blocke it and refused to allow a vote on Obama’s nominee (Merrick Garland). JFC, it wasn’t even that long ago and people have already forgotten, or never bothered to pay attention in the first place, or believed some propaganda they came across. We’re so doomed.

            • peregrin5@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              Hand shaking meme:

              Fascists 🤝 Leftists

              Center: Using misinformation to blame Democrats for literally everything.

              Leftists need to grow some damn braincells and accept responsibility for putting the US in this situation.

              Russia loves how easily manipulated they are.

          • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            6 days ago

            And the democrats did nothing to stop the blatant power grab. They always act powerless and republicans do whatever the fuck they want.

            • Doug Holland@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              The Democratic Party is the Washington Generals. They’re part of the show, but they’re not there to win.

        • Bizzle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          6 days ago

          Not punishing the Confederacy, in my opinion, is where this country went to hell.

          • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Agreed. They should have hanged the Southern elite, and occupied the former confederate states under martial law for at least three generations.

      • Fungah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        In our hubris we put our dicks away. We were warned of the consequences and we didn’t listen. Indeed, the only way forward is forward is, once again, DICKS OUT FOR HARAMBE!

      • archchan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        7 days ago

        Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

        Though I’d hardly signal her death out as the defining factor or turning point of the US’s decline…

        • HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          6 days ago

          Some would say Reagan, but personally I think it was doomed from the wild west days. Rugged individualism bred the selfish nature that’s led to where it is today.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        In theory, if Ruth Bader Ginsberg chose to retire when she was sick, instead of continuing to act on her principles until she died in office, we wouldn’t have a Conservative dominated Supreme Court. It would have changed who got to appoint her successor.

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s like watching an old friend sink into senility. The person you know is slowly being replaced by something else and you are powerless to stop it.

    • Azal@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      6 days ago

      Living in it is like that individual, but that individual is head of the household, has all the money and keys, has locked the door and is wildly armed.

    • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      A more apt comparison is Sparta. The bulk of the work was done by (wage-) slaves, the citizens lived in constant paranoia of an upheaval, constantly fighting real and imaginary enemies both domestic and foreign. Persia (Russia) worked in the shadows to undermine the state, and their frenemies the Athenians (Europeans) are viewed with distrust and contempt. Other city states (China, Israel, the Arab countries) would flip-flop their allegiance depending on circumstance.